Google Self-Driving Cars: 10 Reasons They Go So Slowly - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
IT Life
Commentary
11/15/2015
11:05 AM
David Wagner
David Wagner
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
50%
50%

Google Self-Driving Cars: 10 Reasons They Go So Slowly

A Google autonomous car was pulled over by police for driving below the speed limit. Why can't they go faster? We explore several theories.

Google, Tesla, Nissan: 6 Self-Driving Vehicles Cruising Our Way
Google, Tesla, Nissan: 6 Self-Driving Vehicles Cruising Our Way
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

A Google self-driving car was pulled over by police for driving below the speed limit. The vehicle was moving at 24 mph in a 35 mph zone. But really, that's slower than Usain Bolt. It might as well have been a windup toy.

Google posted that its autonomous vehicles move so slowly because the company wants "them to feel friendly and approachable, rather than zooming scarily through neighborhood streets." Fair enough, but this is an important lesson for Google to learn. Going too slow is as bad as going too fast.

Here's an example: Let's say you're in your car, listening to some awesome music, and you turn a corner and come come upon a Google car driving below the speed limit. It's easy to imagine being caught off guard and possibly rear-ending the vehicle or getting into an accident trying to avoid it.

So, why do Google's self-driving cars move so slowly? I have 10 theories that might explain the comapny's logic.

10 Reasons Google's Self-Driving Cars Move So Slowly

1. You can't do "Look ma, no hands!" if you are going too fast. No one will see you.

2. Google Images needs more pictures for the search term "middle finger." It expects to collect a whole bunch as angry drivers pass by its autonomous vehicles.

3. Google is planning to fund the project by suing all the people who rear-end its cars. Now it has to prove a robot car can get whiplash.

4. Google cars don't have robot dogs in them urging them to go faster so they can feel the wind on their snouts.

(Image: Adam Rifkin via Flickr)

(Image: Adam Rifkin via Flickr)

5. The vehicle is designed to give you that true Driving Miss Daisy experience.

6. If the autonous cars don't go slowly, Google Street View might not pick up all of these wonderful pictures.

7. Let's face it, autonomus cars are basically moving billboards for Google. The slower it goes, the greater the chance other drivers will see it.

[ It might also be to slow down and enjoy the tunes. Read Google Self-Driving Car: A Roadtrip Playlist. ]

8. The car is so busy recording your buying and search habits while you're sitting in it that it doesn't have the bandwidth to drive any faster than it already does.

9. You may have somewhere to get in a hurry, but the car doesn't.

10. Because it didn't take long for someone to post a video of a Tesla car on autopilot "trying to kill" its driver.

**New deadline of Dec. 18, 2015** Be a part of the prestigious InformationWeek Elite 100! Time is running out to submit your company's application by Dec. 18, 2015. Go to our 2016 registration page: InformationWeek's Elite 100 list for 2016.

David has been writing on business and technology for over 10 years and was most recently Managing Editor at Enterpriseefficiency.com. Before that he was an Assistant Editor at MIT Sloan Management Review, where he covered a wide range of business topics including IT, ... View Full Bio
We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Ariella
50%
50%
Ariella,
User Rank: Author
11/16/2015 | 10:00:50 AM
Re: Self-Driving Cars
Actually, Worcester, MA takes worst place, closely followed by Boston, in Allstate's recent list. Fort Collins, CO ranks best.
Ariella
50%
50%
Ariella,
User Rank: Author
11/16/2015 | 10:00:50 AM
Re: Self-Driving Cars
Actually, Worcester, MA takes worst place, closely followed by Boston, in Allstate's recent list. Fort Collins, CO ranks best.
Ariella
50%
50%
Ariella,
User Rank: Author
11/16/2015 | 9:50:49 AM
Re: Self-Driving Cars
@jastroff ineresting, there really are cultural differences --even between states. I remember seeing some ranking of most aggressive drivers.
Ariella
50%
50%
Ariella,
User Rank: Author
11/16/2015 | 8:43:30 AM
Re: Self-Driving Cars
Google has programmed its cars to be rather more cautious than the average driver, which does lead to clashes of style. Supposedly it's something the company is working on, particularly with respect to the problem of "after you" at intersections. 
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
News
How CIO Roles Will Change: The Future of Work
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/1/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
Slideshows
Flash Poll