Judge Dismisses Much Of AMD's Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Judge Dismisses Much Of AMD's Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel

A federal judge ruled that claims that Intel engaged in misconduct overseas fell outside the jurisdiction of U.S. law.

MANHASSET, N.Y. — In a possible setback for AMD, a U.S. District Court judge in Delaware has dismissed foreign commerce claims in the company's antitrust lawsuit against Intel Corp. The judge ruled the claims fell outside the jurisdiction of U.S. law.

Judge Joseph Farnan of the U.S. District Court in Delaware granted Intel's earlier request to dismiss portions of the antitrust suit AMD filed against Intel in June 2005. Intel filed the motion in May, asking that the claims of foreign misconduct be dismissed because they are outside federal law jurisdiction.

In court documents, Intel had argued AMD claims it was injured because its sales offices in Europe and Asia failed to sell more of its German-manufactured microprocessors to foreign customers.

"AMD cannot invoke the U.S. antitrust laws to attempt to address these alleged harms that occurred (if at all) outside the United States," Intel said.

In the ruling, Judge Farnan agreed with Intel, stating "AMD has not demonstrated that the alleged foreign conduct of Intel has direct, substantial and foreseeable effects in the United States which gives rise to its claim."

In the antitrust suit, AMD (Sunnyvale, Calif.) alleged that Intel (Santa Clara, Calif.) has been operating an unlawful monopoly in the x86 microprocessor market and has coerced computer makers, distributors, small system builders and retailers in their dealings with AMD.

Responding to the Delaware judge's decision, AMD spokesman Micheal Silverman said in a statement, "Notwithstanding the judge's ruling today, Intel cannot escape antitrust scrutiny for its conduct...wherever in the world it occurs. As this U.S. litigation is joined by global antitrust investigations, it is clear that Intel cannot escape the consequences of its illegal monopoly abuses."

In a brief interview with EE Times, Silverman said the case is still in its early stages, with a number of companies likely to be asked in coming months to submit evidence that could be material to the case.

"It remains to be seen whether this is a setback," Silverman said. "There are still active investigations outside the U.S."

On Wednesday (Sept. 27) afternoon, the judge set the date of the trial for April 27, 2009.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
1 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
2021 Outlook: Tackling Cloud Transformation Choices
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  1/4/2021
Enterprise IT Leaders Face Two Paths to AI
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  12/23/2020
10 IT Trends to Watch for in 2021
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/22/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll