Judge To Decide Whether NSA Spy Suit Continues - InformationWeek
05:55 PM

Judge To Decide Whether NSA Spy Suit Continues

An online consumer activist group pushes for legal action against the U.S. government and telecoms that cooperated with it.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation will argue Friday that the lawsuits over the National Security Agency's spy program should proceed while the government asks a higher court to overturn a judge's decision to continue hearing the case.

At issue is whether the U.S. government was within the law to monitor domestic phone calls and other communication originating from parties outside the United States in an effort to quash terrorist activities. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has since said the Bush administration will reverse its stance on domestic spying.

Rebecca Jeschke, an EFF spokesperson, said this week that EFF believes the cases should proceed because surveillance of innocent Americans could be continuing. The EFF filed its lawsuit against AT&T, which is one of dozens of similar lawsuits regarding the NSA's surveillance program. The suits could consolidate, but first U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker must decide whether he will continue to hear EFF's case during the appeal.

The government has been guarded about the program and has tried to invoke privileges regarding state secrets to keep the cases from moving forward. At the same time, it has argued that the plaintiffs in the case cannot prove that they are "aggrieved parties."

EFF's lawyers argue that much of the material the government claims is secret has been aired in news reports and that the government's own filings contradict its claims. EFF also argues that phone companies have confirmed some of the claims against the government by stating that declarations from former employees constitute trade secrets. Finally, EFF is arguing that journalists can prove they are aggrieved parties since the government has acknowledged spying when investigators suspected at least one party to a conversation had terrorist ties.

The government has defended the program, stating that it was legal and necessary for preserving national security. Telecommunications companies accused of breaking the law by cooperating with the spy program also maintain that they have not broken any laws.

The hearing is likely to be long since plaintiffs and defendants in several cases are presenting unified arguments. So far, Walker has put his decisions in writing, days after the hearings, rather than making and announcing immediate decisions.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2017 State of IT Report
In today's technology-driven world, "innovation" has become a basic expectation. IT leaders are tasked with making technical magic, improving customer experience, and boosting the bottom line -- yet often without any increase to the IT budget. How are organizations striking the balance between new initiatives and cost control? Download our report to learn about the biggest challenges and how savvy IT executives are overcoming them.
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll