Commentary
12/17/2004
07:25 PM
Commentary
Commentary
Commentary

Letters To The Editor



Uncertain Future

If I were a user of the Enterprise software (the old PeopleSoft product), I would have little reason to trust Larry Ellison ("Ellison Tries To Allay PeopleSoft Customers' Fears," Dec. 9, 2004). As a user of the EnterpriseOne and World products, I have no reason to believe that he will treat my software as a viable product that he will support and enhance. My fear (shared by many in the J.D. Edwards community) is that we'll lose the software that we've used for years.

Robert Robinson
Business Systems Supervisor, Durr Industries, Plymouth, Mich.


Too Good To Be True

In the story, "Did Ukrainian Unrest Disrupt Offshore Work?" (Dec. 6, 2004), you wrote that Brandon Carson was "anxious to tap the firm's $5-an-hour database engineer," but because of unrest in that area he was unable to reach him for several days and project work stopped.

The old axiom "you get what you pay for" comes to mind.

Jim Hummel
Owner, Mister Geek, Cooper City, Fla.


No Linux Crystal Ball

John Foley wants Linux to come up with a three-year plan that would be as reliable regarding features and deadlines as are Microsoft's plans ("The Linux Kernel's Fuzzy Future," Dec. 6, 2004).

Three years is a very long time in the computer world. Life would be easier if we could accurately predict what will happen in the future, but experience has shown that anyone who claims to be able to do that is just blowing smoke.

Besides, if you need something that's not under development, you have the option of funding an effort to make it happen. Try that with Microsoft products!

Bob Nelson
President, Airflow Sciences Corp., Livonia, Mich.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Copyright © 2020 UBM Electronics, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service