MarchFirst Shares Stop Trading On Nasdaq - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


MarchFirst Shares Stop Trading On Nasdaq

MarchFirst Inc. Wednesday became the latest E-service provider without a stock affiliation as shares of the Chicago-based company stopped trading on the Nasdaq when the stock market requested additional financial information from the troubled company. MarchFirst has declined to comment either on its status with the Nasdaq or reports that the E-services provider would lay off between 2,000 and 3,500 of its 7,000 employees.

MarchFirst is far from the poster-child for the financial woes of the E-services provider market. Earlier this week, Viant Corp. said it's closing three offices and laying off 211 employees, or 38% of its staff, and competitor Proxicom Inc. reduced its staff by 227 people, or 19%.

Last week, the Nasdaq notified E-services provider Xpedior Inc. that the company's stock has failed to maintain the required minimum bid price of $1 over a period of 30 consecutive trading days, and that the stock will be de-listed if it doesn't meet those requirements by April 17. Xpedior will also close four of its offices and reduce its workforce by 300 employees. In addition, president Anthony Capers, executive VP of operations Mark Hansen, and senior VP of sales Robert Whitehead left the company.

Now is the time for the clients of these sinking E-services providers to transition their projects to more stable companies, says Forrester Research analyst Christine Overby. If, for example, a client had hired Xpedior for its knowledge of BroadVision software, a viable alternative would be PricewaterhouseCoopers, which has also developed BroadVision expertise. "Another way for midmarket companies to protect their projects," she says, "is to assign a larger number of internal IT staff members to these projects to ensure knowledge is transferred from the previous service provider and can be transferred again if a new service provider is chosen."

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll