Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Comments
Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
MedicalQuack
50%
50%
MedicalQuack,
User Rank: Moderator
1/13/2012 | 3:57:46 PM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
I have watched this since PHRs have come out and have been a big advocate and have many posts on my blog but the average consumer is not sold yet and I do have to say for good reason as you mention it comes down to trust for a lot of it. We don't know who aggregates and sells what data today and know that insurers are on steroids when it comes to behavioral algorithms to predict and also drive compliance. It's like we fear losing some of our freedom and in a way that is correct unless you use HealthVault as an example which is not tethered and not owned by an insurer.

I have said for quite a while that we need to license and tax the data sellers for a couple of reasons, and this does not include browsers who use information internally to make searches better, but rather those like drug stores, insurers and so forth that make billions from getting "free taxpayer data" and then sell it. Walgreens said their data selling business is worth just under $800 million. What do they sell, well without a federal website and laws asking for disclosure, we don't know and again the consumer knows this too and nobody likes the unknown, so until something is done in this area, it's won't change much.

This practice also keeps the lines of inequality growing as it is tech war fare and corporations get richer with selling data they get for free and in the meantime states are having to put governor software systems in place as their servers slow down to a crawl to keep the bots out so consumers can have access, doesn't make sense does it? The very information sources that were set up for consumers is becoming difficult to access as corporate bots beat us to the punch.

I call it the alternative millionaire's tax to license and tax corporations that mine and sell data and make billions. Until some level of equality is derived here, the public is not going to trust in big numbers and for good reason. With huge profits for corporate USA in selling data they mine for free with not having to give anything back but rather keep taking we have a situation that I call "The Attack of the Killer Algorithms" for consumers and we just can't win, and thus so PHRs with the low levels of trust just kind of sit there.

http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com...
Tronman
50%
50%
Tronman,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/13/2012 | 6:01:01 PM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
Thanks, but no thanks. I can take care of myself and I don't need some busybody "health" organization sticking their nose in my personal business. That's the real reason others are also unwilling to go along with this socialist, big brother crap.
Number 6
50%
50%
Number 6,
User Rank: Moderator
1/13/2012 | 6:09:33 PM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
Paul, what are you basing your comments on? Peer-reviewed studies? Surveys and polls? Discussions with other people?

Or only your own opinion?

You're certainly entitled to your view, but his should have been clearly published by IW as an opinion piece.
JimInKS
50%
50%
JimInKS,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/13/2012 | 6:24:05 PM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
I think lack of standards and wide acceptance also plays a part. You don't have much confidence that whatever provider you see will be able to access or use your phr.
dschwartz895
50%
50%
dschwartz895,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/13/2012 | 6:37:45 PM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
There are three main reasons I think people don't want to use centralized data repositories for their PHR: Trust, Trust, and Trust.

There are all of these supposed "security measures" in place to keep data secure.

All of them rely on insecure means of communicating passwords and keys -- the telephone, FAX, and in-person communications, all of which can be overhead or intercepted by anybody. It's a joke!

Every time I contact a healthcare provider, I'm asked to repeat my several pieces of "verifying" information, and most of the time anybody within earshot can hear what I'm saying. This has got to be the worst possible solution!

As far as centralized PHRs go, the reason to avoid them is simple: virtually every insurance plan on the planet contains a clause that says that, in exchange for paying some of your medical costs, the insurer can do whatever they want with your medical information, including sharing it with whomever they like.

Obamacare may have eliminated the ability of insurers to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions, but I have no allusions that insurers are still collecting and analyzing our medical data and using it to build profiles. We have no access to the personal profiles they create about us; we have no say in how, when, or why they're used; and at some point in the future, if the laws change to allow insurers to again deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions, you can bet they'll be far better armed to deny more than ever.

To make matters worse, Republicans seem bound and determined to either repeal Obamacare in its entirety, or else give insurers and Big Pharma even more access to PHR data and keep their uses off-limits to consumers.

We've got several generations of consumers who have been basically trained that "pre-existing conditions won't be covered". The best way to deal with this is to not know.

The fact is, if you know about something "early", the insurance companies can make a case that such knowledge constitutes a "pre-existing condition" and they can deny coverage for it. Well, they could; now they can't. But old habits die hard.

If the medical industry wants to shift consumer attitudes towards prevention, then they need to make it more transparent how our "preventive" PHR records are being used IN TOTALITY, including a guarantee that data collected for PREVENTIVE PURPOSES will NOT, EVER, be used in the future to deny a claim.

I mean ... why should I get regular colonoscopies if they may lead to denial of coverage for something at some point in the future that could bankrupt me?

If neither I nor my doctors have a reason to believe there's a problem, there's a far greater likelihood that something will be covered down the line.

And with the way insurance companies use our PHR data, who's to say they won't build profiles that are more accurate at developing predictive models that will be used in the future to deny coverage if the laws change? There's no "opt-out" option in this database! And our elected officials clearly cannot be trusted to implement laws and policies that are in the best long-term interests in consumers.

Until these things change, I'm afraid that "ignorance is bliss" is perhaps the safest route to take.
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
1/13/2012 | 7:32:09 PM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
It's an opinion column, part of the Commentary section, with Paul's photo. It's not presented as news.
Lisa Henderson
50%
50%
Lisa Henderson,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/13/2012 | 11:33:08 PM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
I agree with Paul, it's going to take a long time for people to change both their health behaviors as well as their trust of online security with their information. I like MedicalQuack's ideas as he is offering some real solutions, on the front end business issues and then, back to the article, Dossia's "downstream" issues with real people. It's holistic, it's a lot of cogs working the wheel, but we have to start somewhere. We are only at the beginning of this dialogue.

Lisa Henderson, InformationWeek Healthcare, contributing editor
teddertn
50%
50%
teddertn,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/16/2012 | 5:15:19 AM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
I would love to spend a couple of hours giving an in depth summary of my own experience after 7 years of being the IT dept for a primary care clinic with 7 providers and a director (the doctor who started the clinic) who has enthusiastically embraced EMR (electronic medical record) software and all the bells a whistles of the digital age, but time is short.
I think most of what you said was fairly accurate, but there is a lot more background that should be filled in. I felt really insulted by the comments of Dossia's CEO linked to in your article. I wonder if he has ever had the conversations with the doctors he sees for his personal care about their experiences with EMRs and especially about providing electronic access to patient medical information. We have been required to change EMRs twice in the last 2 years, but the 5 year run we had with our first one culminated in being able to provide a secure "Practice Portal" that gave truly extensive access to just about everything that ever happened to the patient for the whole 5 years at the clinic. It also allowed secure communications between the patient and the clinic. It was the poster child for what is expected in the digital age. But.....
After a year and a half of really aggressively recruiting our patients to sign up for the portal, we got only 10% signed up. My gut feeling is that the process of using the portal is just too complex and inconvenient. I base this on the effect it had on our website's volume of emails generated by online forms for specific questions about Rx's, billing, appointments, specific medical questions, etc. We went from about 100 emails a day (seeing about 120 patients a day) to about 90. The website was so much easier to use, that in spite of prominent warnings that the normal email communication has several privacy issues, the average patient preferred it because it was so much easier than trying to get through on the phone or logging into the Portal to send the message, and wait for an email to let you know you had a reply that you then had to go back to the Portal to read. So I wouldn't be so quick to assume that privacy trumps ease of use.
Now however, I've had to eliminate all those forms from the website in just the last week due to HIPAA concerns, and I expect the blowback from the patients to be awesome, especially since we do not have a Portal with our current EMR.
My point is that patients want easy access to their doctors and their medical records. They are not concerned with the extraordinary difficulties and expense that adoption and use of an EMR requires. The (sometimes) stunning expense of adding a Portal to your EMR is not even on their radar. They already have easy access to their medical information- they just call their doctor on the phone. If they need another doctor to have their records, they just call. Unfortunately, their patience and understanding of the expense of providing qualified employees to take those calls is non-existent. I've seen our call-center people reduced to tears trying to handle difficult or rude calls. The cost of providing this level of service is also prohibitive at the primary care level, where it is all we can do to keep our heads above water financially.
I think it is unrealistic to expect patients to maintain their own Personal Health Record, and no one is offering to pay the providers of health care to do it. The "incentives" are just not there sufficiently to make it happen. It will be hard enough just to get EMRs in widespread use as they are meant to be used, not in the often trivial way they are all too often now being used.
We have so far to go yet on just the basics- the observers, commentators and regulators need to get realistic about their expectations and demands.
ThePrisoner6
50%
50%
ThePrisoner6,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/16/2012 | 3:58:13 PM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
This is a complex issue, and there are a lot of factors, however teddertn touches on one factor that I think is crucial to gaining acceptance on a larger scale, and that is convenience. Adding an additional burden to the covered individual to collect, retain, and access their data is simply not an option. There is no carrot big enough to make them go to yet another web site and log in to view their records, unless it is as convenient as pressing an icon on their smartphone.

It's not that people don't care - this is an overly simplistic answer to a complex problem. Many people would gladly do it if it helped to eliminate all of the papers and medical bills they keep on file, especially if these documents could be searched and cross-referenced, but they are not interested in navigating multiple firewalls to get access. It is simpler and easier to make a telephone call. They simply don't need the additional burden. It needs to be as easy as swiping their frequent-shopper card at the CVS check-out. If PHRs can do that, then they will be well on their way.

In addition, there must also be some discussion and acknowledgement regarding who this conversion really benefits most - the health administrators, not the individual.

Most people don't need daily, continuous access to their medical records. The only time they need to look at them is to ensure this-or-that co-pay or prescription has been properly substantiated for reimbursement purposes, and these are really artifacts of a system that requires you to pay out-of-pocket, then be reimbursed by the insurer. It is an administrative layer that adds time and cost at every step in the process. Most human beings would rather not have to do this at all.

If we are re-inventing medical records, then some thought should also be given to finding efficiencies in other areas of the system, so they are integrated into an over-arching plan. Re-vamped records alone do not solve the problem. Make peoples' lives easier, and they will come running.
AdvocatePrivacy
50%
50%
AdvocatePrivacy,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/17/2012 | 3:02:42 AM
re: Why Personal Health Records Have Flopped
Everyday there is a new headline about patient data loss. Sure there is a number of people who have a low interest in their health and therefore are not motivated to look in to PHRs, but many consumers will cross a point where it matters. This will take time and the benefit may be of great consequence to those that wish to take advantage of it. But if consumers cannot get past the frightening headlines of ID theft and out of control data losses then the benefit will never be realized past the point of consideration. Privacy of sacred medical information has to become a top priority or educated consumers will not willingly take the risk. Privacy lost once is privacy lost forever. If information about your diagnosis , medications or medical history becomes public it is never again private. Never. Peace of mind is lost forever and most consumers realize there isn't a do-over. Laws today in most states criminalize breaking into a filing cabinet to steal medical records, but very few criminalize actions related to obtaining those records electronically until you can prove they profited from that information.

A combination of updating government policy to hold criminal accountable for criminal actions and holding companies responsible for data breaches when negligent will build faith in a system that could empower patients and assist health care professionals in raising the quality of care.

The information shared with your doctor remains the most sacred of all information. Consumers will respond when they feel they control their own information, and it cannot be had by any and everyone.

www.advocateprivacy.com
Page 1 / 3   >   >>


2020 State of DevOps Report
2020 State of DevOps Report
Download this report today to learn more about the key tools and technologies being utilized, and how organizations deal with the cultural and process changes that DevOps brings. The report also examines the barriers organizations face, as well as the rewards from DevOps including faster application delivery, higher quality products, and quicker recovery from errors in production.
Slideshows
10 Top Cloud Computing Startups
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  8/3/2020
Commentary
Adding Fuel to the MSP vs. In-house IT Debate
Andrew Froehlich, President & Lead Network Architect, West Gate Networks,  8/6/2020
Commentary
How Enterprises Can Adopt Video Game Cloud Strategy
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/28/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Enterprise Automation: Do More with Less
In this IT Trend Report, we highlight the benefits of automation and the various tools as enterprises navigate turbulent times, try to do more with less, keep their operations running, and stay on track with digital modernizations.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll