Microsoft Surface Pro 3: Why To Buy - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Comments
Microsoft Surface Pro 3: Why To Buy
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Author
6/28/2014 | 8:45:50 AM
At the desk vs. ...?
They make ergonomic floor stands for tablets that will allow you to place them at just the right comfortable height for you, wherever you are (i.e., whether at a desk, on a couch or recliner, or even in bed).  This is especially important for somebody like me who has back and neck issues.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/26/2014 | 3:54:16 PM
Re: What about the glued in components/built in obsolescence/ impossibility to repair?
@beyond,

That's really disappointing. Thanks for sharing your experience-- sorry it didn't turn out better. Panos Panay tossed the Surface Pro 3 on the floor when he launched the device, in order to demonstrate its durability. Given that Microsoft is now volunteering that the device can survive a fall, I wonder if people will experience the same kind of service that you did.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/26/2014 | 3:50:54 PM
Re: shopper report
Yeah, it'll be a real bummer if Microsoft runs into the same inventory problems that it ran into with the 256 GB Pro 2. They've given themselves some breathing room before the i3 and i7 models are expected, so hopefully they can meet their deadlines. I expect demand will be higher than it was for previous models, but we're not talking about iPad-level demand. If Microsoft could produce too many first-gen Surfaces, then they have the capacity to produce enough Pro 3s-- as long as they've planned well.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/26/2014 | 3:47:00 PM
Re: Too expensive
@anon,

While Apple vs. Microsoft conversations often incite kneejerk fanboyism, I think there's more value to Apple than mere rhetoric. Admittedly, it's not all easy to quantify.  But Apple's usually the top seller of $1000+ PCs (which sometimes surprises people—but it makes sense if you think about it, given that virtually all Macs are more than $1000). Granted, Apple's popularity among affluent people doesn't dismiss the possibility that some people with too much money buy Apple products just to be fashionable. Nevertheless, this popularity indicates that people with enough money to be discerning choose Apple at a much higher rate. One assumes that some of these people perceive real value, rather the trendies, given the large numbers we're talking about.

Additionally, even though Apple machines use the same components as cheaper Windows machines, for certain kinds of performance, Apple machines perform better, thanks to Apple's tight control of both hardware and software. Moreover, while the internal components might be comparable to those in cheaper Windows devices, the external components are a different issue. I know design don't matter to everyone, especially if you're particularly utilitarian, but it matters to others—and if you make people comfortable, they'll be more productive. I think you can also make some arguments in favor of OS X, maybe not on the IT side, but for users, it's clearly a different aesthetic than Windows, and features such as Spaces are pretty great. Does that mean everyone would buy a MacBook Pro if money were no object? No, of course not. As you point out, gamers have better options, and if you're running a business and need to be frugal, you can get the job done with Windows machines while spending half as much. And even though I like OS X, I wouldn't fault somehow who subjectively just doesn't like it. But the point is—Macs provide some empirical value, and even if some of Apple's benefits aren't as tangible as specs, I think it offers more than rhetoric.
Michael Endler
100%
0%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/26/2014 | 3:23:38 PM
Re: Enterprise or bust
Compared to any other single manufacturer, Apple retains customers very, very well. Considering how expensive its computers are, that says something, doesn't it?
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/26/2014 | 3:20:41 PM
Re: Surface Pro 3 is a great productivity device for a lot of people, but probably not for the mass market
@indranil

Yes, definitely, the Surface Pro 3 will be a fine device for many students. Much more practical than the early models, in that regard.

As for marketing, I think they've corrected some problems while introducing others. The original Surface ads were sort of entertaining, but breakdancing employees and stomping school girls didn't really communicate how the devices were supposed to work. For the second-generation devices, Microsoft corrected this problem. The current Surface Pro 3 ad is probably the strongest one yet; in 30 seconds, it gives you a pretty fair and accurate look at all the ways you might use the device. It also doesn't hurt that the current commercial advertises a better product. But even though the commercials are better, many have questioned whether Microsoft should be emphasizing comparisons with the MacBook Air. While I can see why Microsoft is making the comparison, I can also see how it further muddies the waters regarding what Surface is, and for whom.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/23/2014 | 6:06:22 PM
Re: Too expensive
@WillNy3

Thanks for the thoughts. I think you're right—if you want to maximize qualities such as PC specs or tablet app access, the Surface Pro 3 isn't a very frugal option. That said, I don't think it's designed for people with those priorities. The MacBook Air is pretty successful, and the Surface Pro 3 generally meets or exceeds the MacBook's spec standards, so I think for its target audience of mobile professionals, the Surface Pro 3 brings enough power. I admit I'd like to see an option with a more powerful GPU, but the i5-based demo unit with 8 GB of RAM hasn't had any problem keeping up with whatever I've needed. I can't fault Microsoft for balancing  form factor and power the way it has. The Pro 3 is a unique device, and the extent to which you can justify its high cost is the extent to which that uniqueness matters to you.

Also, Chrome and touch don't get along well—very true. Good point.

Also agree that the original Touch Covers were awful. The second-generation keyboards were serviceable. The one released alongside the Pro 3 is quite good. It's more rigid and spacious (though I'm pretty sure key travel and layout are actually the same), and includes a very nice (though not MacBook-level nice) trackpad.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/23/2014 | 5:49:14 PM
Re: Surface Pro 3 is TERRIFIC
@Ira,

"I am unsure if it is safe to have any computer functioning in close contact to my body."

I'd wondered that too. When I was younger, my mother, no doubt thinking of future grandchildren, always used to warn me about using laptops on my lap. I don't hear people talk about that concern much any more-- but I did a quick Google search and found tons of recent stuff on the topic. At least with a device like the Pro 3, you don't have a big battery sitting directly on your lap.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/23/2014 | 5:44:02 PM
Re: Surface Pro is another device for it's purpose
@howeIn

Thanks for sharing the experiences with the Surface Pro 2. I think you say it well-- the Surface Pro 2 is neither tablet nor laptop but something else, more like its own category. I think you can call the Pro 3 a laptop more easily than you could either of the first two-- but it's still something different as well.

I think if you liked the Pro 2 you'll definitely like the Pro 3. Unless I'm making major allowances for a small niche of users (e.g. people who value the Surface Pro 2's smaller footprint above all else), I can't think of a way that the Pro 3 isn't better.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
6/23/2014 | 5:20:09 PM
Re: Enterprise or bust
Let's hear it, MacBook Air owners, any takers? $650 back (or maybe less... see the fine print) takes a lot of sting out of the Surface Pro 3's cost.



Page 1 / 2   >   >>


The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Commentary
New Storage Trends Promise to Help Enterprises Handle a Data Avalanche
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  4/1/2021
Slideshows
11 Things IT Professionals Wish They Knew Earlier in Their Careers
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/6/2021
Commentary
How to Submit a Column to InformationWeek
InformationWeek Staff 4/9/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Successful Strategies for Digital Transformation
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll