Follow IW:
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Re: That was an apology?
Really, was there any real impact from this? Yes it was a breach of trust but it's not as if tilting the New Feed balance from cats videos to reports of accidents and the like caused a spike in suicides. Until there's proof Facebook's experiment did harm, we would be better off working about other proven depressants like drugs and alcohol that do actually play a role in harm.
Re: That was an apology?
Maybe I'm just hopelessly cynical, but you get what you pay for. Facebook isn't maintaining all these data centers out of the goodness of its corporate personhood heart. It's using us and our data. If people don't like that, they can go back to personal phone calls and letters. Gasp!
That was an apology?
Adam Kramer's apology for "all the anxiety the study caused" seems to overlook the fact that most reseasrchers seek the consent of the researched in advance, as opposed to pointing out their aniety after finding themselves the subject of research. Each day the faux apologies -- apologetic sounding words that place blame anywhere but on the apologist -- get a little worse.
Re: Parody
I agree Rob - If you hadn't said it, I was going to!
Re: EXACTLY
Careful, someone might cite you as a source of info on the NSA's nefarious plot to make Facebook users sad and thus increase sales of Budweiser, which as everyone knows is a front for the FBI.
Re: EXACTLY
Just wait til we learn the NSA was also involved in the experiment. Mwahaha.
Re: Violation of user trust -- or what's left of it
I'm surprised this study passed the muster of an internal review board (which is required for peer-reviewed academic publishing). My wife has to jump through all kinds of hoops to consent from interview subjects for her research. Seems like if you're going to mess around with people's mental states, you'd need a consent form that isn't buried in a long terms-of-service notice that people don't read and may have clicked an agreement years and years ago.
Re: Violation of user trust -- or what's left of it
There should be an app that scans headlines & finds the associated Snopes link, if it exists.
Re: Violation of user trust -- or what's left of it
That's a fair point. Though I'd argue sensationalized headlines are not as devious as what Facebook did. The reader can at least find out pretty quickly if they've been duped just by reading the story. But it's the same principle.
2018 State of the Cloud
Cloud adoption is growing, but how are organizations taking advantage of it? Interop ITX and InformationWeek surveyed technology decision-makers to find out, read this report to discover what they had to say!
White Papers
Current Issue
Cybersecurity Strategies for the Digital EraAt its core, digital business relies on strong security practices. In addition, leveraging security intelligence and integrating security with operations and developer teams can help organizations push the boundaries of innovation.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong 
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll
- Terms of Service
- Privacy Statement
- Legal Entities
- Copyright © 2018 UBM, All rights reserved
Tweet This
User Rank: Moderator
7/2/2014 | 9:30:11 AM
Yes, they're called Institutional Review Boards- IRB's, and were put in place in part because of problems like the Tuskegee study. Look them up.
So a good question to ask is whether and why the University of Michigan's IRB approved this.