Why IT Needs To Stop Saying No - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Why IT Needs To Stop Saying No
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
10/10/2015 | 2:25:04 PM
Re: Some really great points!

I don't miss the days where I had to explain to management WHY things like this are not good soultions. Good luck.

>> So none of business users, from President on down, can understand why we don't just use Time Warner. Or double our Corp circuit capacity. They don't realize the proxy and McAfee are probably the bottleneck. Put those at back of Time Warner circuit and performance is not likely to be much different.
User Rank: Ninja
10/8/2015 | 2:07:07 PM
Re: Some really great points!
Overall, you can't argue with msg in this article. Communication and collaboration skils are every bit as important as technical skills. But there is a role for IT to be the voice of reason also.

Here is example I'm dealing with right now at our business unit. Globally, we use a private network of circuits and all internet access connected to business servers/workstations is dictated by policy to use that network. Internet access is funneled thru proxy servers, along with McAfee filtering/antivirus. We have two T1's worth of overall throughput (3Mbs) connected to our hub where proxy sits. The two T1's cost about $900 a month.

Our internet service is horribly slow, especially compared to what we have at home or even over 4G to our smartphones. I bring Time Warner Business Class service in as backup, 7MB of bandwidth for $83 per month. A 200MB file that takes 45 minutes over Corp internet takes less than 5 on Time Warner.

So none of business users, from President on down, can understand why we don't just use Time Warner. Or double our Corp circuit capacity. They don't realize the proxy and McAfee are probably the bottleneck. Put those at back of Time Warner circuit and performance is not likely to be much different.

The business users don't care about security (until they get hammered by ransomware or something), they just want speed. But that doesn't make them right. I'm reluctant to throw anymore money at that circuit when I'm convinced it's likely the proxy or QoS on that circuit which is killing internet browsing/download speed. It be real easy to be accomodating and throw money at that circuit, then when it failed throw up my hands and say "I tried, anything else I can do for you?"

The business expects us to apply our technical expertise in these areas, to watch their backs. Not just be a bunch of likeable people rubberstamping any idea they have. They need us to save them from themselves sometimes. The key is to do it with tact, to be able to communicate your reasons.

One final story. At my first company, when I was right out of school, the company installed a server from IBM. IBM sized the server (this was 1988, when the new AS400 server was $250,000+) but it was way undersized. Interactive response times were sometimes 30 seconds, batch program compiles took an hour. Users were rightfully screaming. The President pulled me aside, really the first conversation I ever had with him directly. He said "Terry, when I look at IT here, I see you and a bunch of really nice guys. What's really going on here?" I told him we were two machine sizes too small, IBM gambled trying to keep cost down to get the sale. We upgraded the two sizes and were back in business.

The point of this story is: You can be perceived as being a nice guy but what the business needs is you know what you are doing technically. Within a couple of years, of the 11 other really nice people I worked with in IT, only 3 of us were the IT department.
User Rank: Ninja
10/7/2015 | 5:00:53 PM
Re: Some really great points!
@Stratustician    I agree.   IT is often it's own worse enemy. Being open and receptive goes along way.  Of course there are two sides to every issue but IT could do a better job of holding up their part of the deal.
User Rank: Ninja
10/7/2015 | 1:54:55 PM
Some really great points!
First off, I love how honest and direct his language is.  We've all worked with IT folks that remind us of characters that he's mentioned, and he brings some really good points.  Customers will buy from companies who make their experiences easier, and if you can service both your internal and external customers in a way that doesn't seem like all you're doing is putting in roadblocks, you'll get much better support and results.  IT has definitely got a reputation of being naysayers and the first ones to say no, but changing your approach and being, for some people, less of a *explative*, companies will see way better internal collaboration.

The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
2021 Outlook: Tackling Cloud Transformation Choices
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  1/4/2021
Enterprise IT Leaders Face Two Paths to AI
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  12/23/2020
10 IT Trends to Watch for in 2021
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/22/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll