Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
Yep I got a substantial speed boost from win8 on one of my old computers as well. However, I still spend most my time in desktop mode and for me the best app I've used in the last few months has been Aikin HyperSearch. It's fairly new, but hands down the most powerful search I've encountered for windows 8 or 7. http://www.grappledata.com/aik...
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
Windows 8 is great, for me so we can make an app and get revenue from that, and for app I just want to share, #ANDATUBE, where you can get update music and movies hit list, and also browsing, streaming, and downloading #Youtube videos! here is the link
http://apps.microsoft.com/wind...
http://apps.microsoft.com/wind...
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
I suspect the Desktop may go away altogether with the next major release of Windows. It's weirdly out of place in Win 8. Then again, I find myself spending 95% of my time using the Desktop rather than the Start shell. I'm wondering if other Win 7 upgraders are doing the same thing...
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
If I ever install a commercial version of Win 8, I tried both the consumer and release previews, I don't imagine I will go through the admittedly convoluted process of clicks necessary to shutdown the system. I suspect I will continue to just press Alt+F4 like have been doing in the previews.
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
It is a memory HOG.
Surface 32GB is now to be renamed Surface 16GB.
And see how a clueless a..hole shill replies to this... their "trusty" SD cards card, never mind that SD are notoriously unreliable and slow as hell.
Surface 32GB is now to be renamed Surface 16GB.
And see how a clueless a..hole shill replies to this... their "trusty" SD cards card, never mind that SD are notoriously unreliable and slow as hell.
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
Windows 8 appears to be a touch screen menu system adapted to PC's. While this may work for tablets and phones, the extra scrolling and the loss of perceived "standards" like the start window and the tool bar will harm sales, and the extra mousework will soon have people looking back at Win 7 with nostalgia.
I get the distinct feeling that Windows 8 will be the new Windows Vista, hogging processor time and memory and generally being a disappointment. I went from Win Xp to Win Vista and a month later went back to Xp. I suspect the same will happen with Win 8. Microsoft still thinks it can dictate the market, and that ended with the ascent of Linux. Microsoft needs to pay more attention to their customers and less attention to their designers. It's customers who drive the market, not the developers.
I get the distinct feeling that Windows 8 will be the new Windows Vista, hogging processor time and memory and generally being a disappointment. I went from Win Xp to Win Vista and a month later went back to Xp. I suspect the same will happen with Win 8. Microsoft still thinks it can dictate the market, and that ended with the ascent of Linux. Microsoft needs to pay more attention to their customers and less attention to their designers. It's customers who drive the market, not the developers.
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
I more than agree with RpDN. Windows 8 is a user interface nightmare to begin with, not just because of the start button and the nuisance of the forced start screen. It appears someone hates customers and decided to aggravate them in some form of sick revenge. Why did everything that used to be formatted to the left side get changed to the right and vise-versa? I would also add that despite the fact I have a brand new (3 day old) 3.4 Ghz, 8GB, 64 bit system, I think Windows 8 runs slower (my IP is GCI, commercial, so it's not the provider). It appears they don't have the smarts to avoid the old mistake of trying to fix or improve something that works perfectly. Or maybe it's just some new big wig that thinks he has to justify his job so he'll do anything, even if it's wrong.
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
"...and avoiding the Desktop like the compromise solution that it is"
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but since when did the Desktop all of the sudden become a "compromise solution"? There has been decades of UI development, experiment and refinement that has led to the current desktop metaphor as the optimal way to interact with a computer. Likewise, the mouse and keyboard have also proven to be optimal, efficient and relatively ergonomic input methods.
I'm afraid I simply don't understand this latest trend of forcing the UI conventions of a 4 inch screened telephone onto a full-on desktop computer. The smartphone UI truly is the compromise solution - touch input is extremely imprecise, imparts wear, tear and fingerprints on the same screen you have to view, and the 4 to 5 inch size necessitates apps running in full-screen only, as there simply isn't enough room to display anything more than a single, relatively simplistic app's UI at a time. THAT truly IS a compromise. It's one we accept for the convenience of a handheld device with so much utility and capabilities, but make no mistake, the smartphone UI is a compromise.
This is why I'm having trouble seeing the logic in forcing all the limitations of the smartphone UI on a full desktop computer, and not only disregarding all the resources the typical desktop system provides (ample screen space, ample memory and processor resources, precision pointing devices, etc), but in addition, going to far as to now claim that the traditional desktop is the compromise solution that the touch-UI solves.
I'm sorry, I have no desire to touch my desktop monitor. I don't want it covered in fingerprints, I don't want to reach across my desk to do so, and I need more precision than my finger can provide. And as with most people, my work requires a fair amount of multitasking, be it between several full desktop apps, or a single one and a combination of contact apps - e-mail, skype, etc. On a desktop, a touch-first, full screen only UI negatively and dramatically impairs productivity. Sure, there are a few specific use scenarios where it can be preferable (a specific, primarily single use system like a media PC attached to a television, for example), but for the general use desktop computer, it's just a very poor fit.
It's really concerning today when so many in general, and journalists especially, are so willing to jump on a bandwagon, buying into, endorsing and promoting an idea riddled with obvious contradictions, falsehoods and plain old failed logic. The smartphone UI is the compromise solution even when it's on a smartphone, and exponentially more so when it's slapped, without change, on a full desktop computer. That people not only blindly accept that compromise, not only endorse and promote the idea, but then claim the traditional desktop is actually the compromise is, quite frankly, frightening and bizarre.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but since when did the Desktop all of the sudden become a "compromise solution"? There has been decades of UI development, experiment and refinement that has led to the current desktop metaphor as the optimal way to interact with a computer. Likewise, the mouse and keyboard have also proven to be optimal, efficient and relatively ergonomic input methods.
I'm afraid I simply don't understand this latest trend of forcing the UI conventions of a 4 inch screened telephone onto a full-on desktop computer. The smartphone UI truly is the compromise solution - touch input is extremely imprecise, imparts wear, tear and fingerprints on the same screen you have to view, and the 4 to 5 inch size necessitates apps running in full-screen only, as there simply isn't enough room to display anything more than a single, relatively simplistic app's UI at a time. THAT truly IS a compromise. It's one we accept for the convenience of a handheld device with so much utility and capabilities, but make no mistake, the smartphone UI is a compromise.
This is why I'm having trouble seeing the logic in forcing all the limitations of the smartphone UI on a full desktop computer, and not only disregarding all the resources the typical desktop system provides (ample screen space, ample memory and processor resources, precision pointing devices, etc), but in addition, going to far as to now claim that the traditional desktop is the compromise solution that the touch-UI solves.
I'm sorry, I have no desire to touch my desktop monitor. I don't want it covered in fingerprints, I don't want to reach across my desk to do so, and I need more precision than my finger can provide. And as with most people, my work requires a fair amount of multitasking, be it between several full desktop apps, or a single one and a combination of contact apps - e-mail, skype, etc. On a desktop, a touch-first, full screen only UI negatively and dramatically impairs productivity. Sure, there are a few specific use scenarios where it can be preferable (a specific, primarily single use system like a media PC attached to a television, for example), but for the general use desktop computer, it's just a very poor fit.
It's really concerning today when so many in general, and journalists especially, are so willing to jump on a bandwagon, buying into, endorsing and promoting an idea riddled with obvious contradictions, falsehoods and plain old failed logic. The smartphone UI is the compromise solution even when it's on a smartphone, and exponentially more so when it's slapped, without change, on a full desktop computer. That people not only blindly accept that compromise, not only endorse and promote the idea, but then claim the traditional desktop is actually the compromise is, quite frankly, frightening and bizarre.
re: 10 Great Windows 8 Apps
My Windows 7 computers were SLOW - only by upgrading to Windows 8 did they speed up! I like Windows 8...
Research: 2014 State of Database Technology
IT's stuck in neutral. Exciting techs like NoSQL, DBaaS, and distributed architectures are in use by few of our 956 respondents. Just 5% have Hadoop in production, and a mere 1% use Amazon DynamoDB for critical functions. What will it take to jump-start innovation?
White Papers
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.
- Featured UBM Tech Sites
- InformationWeek |
- Network Computing |
- Dr. Dobbs |
- Dark Reading
- Our Markets:
- Business Technology |
- Electronics |
- Game & App Development
- Working With Us:
- Advertising Contacts |
- Event Calendar |
- Tech Marketing Solutions |
- Corporate Site |
- Contact Us / Feedback
Tweet This
User Rank: Apprentice
4/28/2013 | 5:23:44 AM
www.spectra.com