Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
re: Windows 8 Tablets' Big Flaw: Hardware Compromise
AustinIT "Most of the devices are geared for consumption and not creation." Exactly.
OldUberGoober "...a stupidly compromised OS (RT) that offers no advantages over the opposition" Well, the advantage is in the creation, while the disadvantage is in the consumption - it doesn't run legacy Windows programs, and it doesn't have a so called eco-system to tap into in terms of apps, like iPad or Android.
OldUberGoober "...a stupidly compromised OS (RT) that offers no advantages over the opposition" Well, the advantage is in the creation, while the disadvantage is in the consumption - it doesn't run legacy Windows programs, and it doesn't have a so called eco-system to tap into in terms of apps, like iPad or Android.
re: Windows 8 Tablets' Big Flaw: Hardware Compromise
A major question is whether the overall business and government markets will even need Win 8 on tablets at all. Right now, there are already tens of millions of iPads in that space. Even without Office, sales are doing very well. So where is the advantage of Win 8 tablets? What do they have to offer that the tens of millions of workers don't already have?
This is a big question for Microsoft. If their major advantage, or what they may think of as their major advantage isn't proving to be a detriment to iOS and even Android sales to business and government, then what will be? Is there anything?
I understand that there might be some in that space that will prefer a Win 8 tablet, but what are those numbers? Millions a quarter? Hundreds of thousands per quarter? Either way, those are small numbers. Even a 10.6" Surface has a screen that's really too small for comfortable classic OS and software use. Remember convertibles? Even with much bigger screens, of between 13-15", they were still considered to be too small for practical use.
It's very possible that Win 8 tablets will never be more than a niche because of this no matter how good the hardware becomes.
This is a big question for Microsoft. If their major advantage, or what they may think of as their major advantage isn't proving to be a detriment to iOS and even Android sales to business and government, then what will be? Is there anything?
I understand that there might be some in that space that will prefer a Win 8 tablet, but what are those numbers? Millions a quarter? Hundreds of thousands per quarter? Either way, those are small numbers. Even a 10.6" Surface has a screen that's really too small for comfortable classic OS and software use. Remember convertibles? Even with much bigger screens, of between 13-15", they were still considered to be too small for practical use.
It's very possible that Win 8 tablets will never be more than a niche because of this no matter how good the hardware becomes.
re: Windows 8 Tablets' Big Flaw: Hardware Compromise
Is is pretty clear that MS has some catching up to do with this hybrid approach to be all things to all people with their new OS. What we are seeing are the dynamics being played out over how to bridge the many divides that define how a computing device can satisfy the needs of business, consumer, BYOD, and IT management all in one OS/device. None of the current offerings do it all. Not from Apple, Android, nor Microsoft. We are also seeing how huge an impact that mobile and small form factor are having on the market. Most of the devices are geared for consumption and not creation. If MS and it's partners can get it right with 8.1, Haswell, and just the right mix of hardware, then we may see a different trajectory that all this takes. Sit tight, this is going to be an interesting second half.
re: Windows 8 Tablets' Big Flaw: Hardware Compromise
Given a choice between a stupidly compromised OS (RT) that offers no advantages over the opposition and a resource hog (Real Win8), both with an unpopular UI, where's the win? While they will run Windows apps in a compromised way, x86/64 tablets running Win8 aren't going to have most of the advantages that make tablets popular, and the improvements they get will be mirrored in iPad and Android tablets as well.
Reminds me of a couple of bits of history. Micro$oft sold their Unix license to SCO and when they needed a real OS to replace DOS pride got in the way and they spent a billion bucks writing NT, when $50 million would have made Unix a better and easier OS than NT ever was; they could do that because they were the 900 pound gorilla on the desktop. From the darker depths of history, for a year or two back in the '70s it was pretty clear that bubble memory that was going to replace DRAM as soon as they got it improved just a little. It got better, but DRAM got better even faster, and now no one has even heard of it.
It is not 100% clear to me which model this will follow, but I strongly suspect Win8 will be treated like Vista and generally ignored by business, even on tablets, except in a few verticals. M$ just doesn't have the muscle they used to; there are too many decent alternatives.
Reminds me of a couple of bits of history. Micro$oft sold their Unix license to SCO and when they needed a real OS to replace DOS pride got in the way and they spent a billion bucks writing NT, when $50 million would have made Unix a better and easier OS than NT ever was; they could do that because they were the 900 pound gorilla on the desktop. From the darker depths of history, for a year or two back in the '70s it was pretty clear that bubble memory that was going to replace DRAM as soon as they got it improved just a little. It got better, but DRAM got better even faster, and now no one has even heard of it.
It is not 100% clear to me which model this will follow, but I strongly suspect Win8 will be treated like Vista and generally ignored by business, even on tablets, except in a few verticals. M$ just doesn't have the muscle they used to; there are too many decent alternatives.
re: Windows 8 Tablets' Big Flaw: Hardware Compromise
And don't forget the ridiculously short battery life of the Surface. 4 hours is just not enough, not even for casual home use.
re: Windows 8 Tablets' Big Flaw: Hardware Compromise
The Helix has some fans; Seton Hall, for instance, is deploying it to students. Its screen is a little bigger than the Surface's, and its dockable keyboard, though less portable than the Surface's, is nicer and more ergonomically functional. It's a good tablet.
But the Helix also costs a fortune, and for some users, it's still going to compliment, rather than replace, a larger PC. I think that qualifies it as a niche product. I don't think Lenovo is wrong, per se, to price it as they have; I just think its cost-design-function ratios are too imbalanced for it to achieve breakout success on, say, the level of the MacBook Air, a comparably priced device.
But the Helix also costs a fortune, and for some users, it's still going to compliment, rather than replace, a larger PC. I think that qualifies it as a niche product. I don't think Lenovo is wrong, per se, to price it as they have; I just think its cost-design-function ratios are too imbalanced for it to achieve breakout success on, say, the level of the MacBook Air, a comparably priced device.
re: Windows 8 Tablets' Big Flaw: Hardware Compromise
You need to consider all the devices available! I recently acquired the Lenovo Helix tablet, and it is the best of both worlds! Great keyboard and tablet works like an ultrabook and tablet. Yes, the screen is on the small side, but now I don't have to carry my heavier laptop and Android tablet, and since it's Windows 8 Pro, all my documents are compatible. I think this is the way laptops will go in the future.
Research: 2014 State of Database Technology
IT's stuck in neutral. Exciting techs like NoSQL, DBaaS, and distributed architectures are in use by few of our 956 respondents. Just 5% have Hadoop in production, and a mere 1% use Amazon DynamoDB for critical functions. What will it take to jump-start innovation?
White Papers
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.
- Featured UBM Tech Sites
- InformationWeek |
- Network Computing |
- Dr. Dobbs |
- Dark Reading
- Our Markets:
- Business Technology |
- Electronics |
- Game & App Development
- Working With Us:
- Advertising Contacts |
- Event Calendar |
- Tech Marketing Solutions |
- Corporate Site |
- Contact Us / Feedback
Tweet This
User Rank: Apprentice
7/20/2013 | 7:03:09 PM