Microsoft's Open Compute Move: Just Good PR? - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

CIO Insights & Innovation
Security & Risk Strategy
Team Building & Staffing
IT Strategy
Digital Business
Project Management
Programming Languages
Dr. Dobb's
Enterprise Applications
Operating Systems
Productivity/Collaboration Apps
Network Security
Careers & People
Threat Intelligence
IoT
Attacks & Breaches
Application Security
Cloud Security
Endpoint Security
Mobile Security
Perimeter Security
Risk Management
Operations Security
Analytics
Vulnerabilities & Threats
Security & Risk Strategy
Infrastructure as a Service
Platform as a Service
Software as a Service
Cloud Storage
Data Centers
Mobile Applications
Mobile Devices
Mobile Business
Enterprise Mobility Management
AI/Machine Learning
Big Data Analytics
Hardware/Architectures
Software Platforms
IoT
Networking
Wireless Infrastructure
Data Centers
Cloud Infrastructure
Careers and Certifications
Network Security
Government
Healthcare
Wall Street & Technology
Bank Systems & Technology
Insurance & Technology
Industries
Government
Healthcare
Wall Street & Technology
Bank Systems & Technology
Insurance & Technology
IT Life
Careers
Mobile
Mobile Applications
Mobile Devices
Mobile Business
Enterprise Mobility Management
Software
Enterprise Applications
Operating Systems
Productivity/Collaboration Apps
Comments
Microsoft's Open Compute Move: Just Good PR?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
JasonJ043
50%
50%
JasonJ043,
 User Rank: Apprentice
1/30/2014 | 11:44:52 PM
Re: Hogwash
You are obviously very misinformed.  Windows is incredably stable, and has been since Vista onwards.  Also, Microsoft has many open source projects.  The entirety of ASP.NET is open source.  They own CodePlex, when developers can post open source software projects to collaborate.  This open hardware is anything but a PR move.  If others start using their designs, the servers they use in the future will be cheaper because of economies of scale.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
 User Rank: Author
1/30/2014 | 5:00:17 PM
Re: Much to lose?
As the saying goes,"Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer."

Besides, other companies already offer open-source freemium models to attract customers to pay for licensed products.  It only makes sense for Microsoft to do the same.
asksqn
50%
50%
asksqn,
 User Rank: Ninja
1/30/2014 | 4:16:41 PM
Hogwash
This is laughable at best.  MS is anathema to anything that isn't locked down into a licensing scheme.  That the company believes (or for that matter, anyone else) that its announcement of OCP would be any kind of game changer is a joke.  This is nothing more than a big PR move with MS hoping to fool most of the people most of the time, which it continues to do with its unstable, bloated OS year after year.
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
 User Rank: Ninja
1/30/2014 | 10:52:49 AM
Re: Much to lose?
I do think OCP is going to remain in the realm of Web-scale organizations. The Web-scale folks run so big that every penny they can shave via a specialized design pays back in multiples. But because the designs are so specialized, I don't really see them moving en masse to the enterprise or mid market. Some tweaks may trickle down to the Dells and HPs that manufacture systems for the masses, but in my opinion OCP is about custom designs for highly specific requirements.
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
 User Rank: Author
1/30/2014 | 10:30:14 AM
Re: Much to lose?
Doesn't that presume that this Open Compute movement will stay in the web giant realm?  I would think the threat to Microsoft comes if it moves into the merely big and the midmarket data centers, at which point Microsoft needs to offer options to embrace a new hardware platform while keeping your Windows-centric app platform.
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
 User Rank: Ninja
1/30/2014 | 10:20:57 AM
Re: Much to lose?
It seems like mostly a PR move to me. The kinds of companies looking at open hardware designs run massive infrastructures that emphasize inexpensive components to support massive scale. One of those inexpensive components is Linux. I think it's unlikely that a Web-scale organization will want to pay the license costs to run Windows, even if it is on open hardware. I think Windows just wants to stick its head under the halo of the "open" movement. A hardware design is an easy way to get some of that glow without making any substantial changes to way it operates.
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
 User Rank: Strategist
1/29/2014 | 11:25:11 PM
Linux was part of x86 revolution; so was Windows Server
It's good PR but it's more than that. The company has come to understand the role that open systems play, even when it feels competitive with them. And open source hardware is not a threat. Linux was part of an x86 revolution in the enterprise data center. So was Windows Server. Now the enterprise is starting to migrate its operations into the public cloud. Microsoft wants to participate in that process. Resistance, after all, might be about as successful as trying to beat back Linux.
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
 User Rank: Author
1/29/2014 | 2:48:02 PM
Much to lose?
Open Compute from what I understand is primarily a threat to proprietary hardware makers, so there might not be much to lose for Microsoft. Michael notes that Open Compute users today are Linux centric, but maybe that's the reason for Microsoft to cozy help. Will companies combine open source hardware with Windows software? What kind of hurdles would that create?   
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
 User Rank: Author
1/29/2014 | 1:18:19 PM
MS cloud talent
Joining OCP also could help MS attract talent from the cloud community. Quite a brain trust in that project group, right?


2020 State of DevOps Report
2020 State of DevOps Report
Download this report today to learn more about the key tools and technologies being utilized, and how organizations deal with the cultural and process changes that DevOps brings. The report also examines the barriers organizations face, as well as the rewards from DevOps including faster application delivery, higher quality products, and quicker recovery from errors in production.
Download Now!
Editors' Choice
News
The State of Chatbots: Pandemic Edition
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  9/10/2020
Commentary
Deloitte on Cloud, the Edge, and Enterprise Expectations
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  9/14/2020
Slideshows
Data Science: How the Pandemic Has Affected 10 Popular Jobs
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  9/9/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
IT Automation Transforms Network Management
In this special report we will examine the layers of automation and orchestration in IT operations, and how they can provide high availability and greater scale for modern applications and business demands.
Download This Issue!
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll