Microsoft Trial Update: Both Sides Put Spin On Courtroom Events - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Microsoft Trial Update: Both Sides Put Spin On Courtroom Events

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- In what is fast becoming a tradition, lawyers on both sides of the government-Microsoft Corp. rift took turns outside the courtroom putting a spin on the day's events.

Microsoft spokesman Mark Murray was quick to claim victory from Wednesday morning's session at which attorney John Warden rebutted Netscape Communications Corp.'s claims that Microsoft tried to run it out of the browser business with predatory pricing.

"We think this was a very good day for Microsoft in court," Murray said. The company presented "very powerful facts that undermined and chipped away at the government's case," he added.

Microsoft attorney Warden used E-mail and a deposition from Netscape Chairman Jim Clark to show that Microsoft planned to put the browser into Windows and give it away, even in advance of a June 1995 meeting between the companies.

Netscape executives said that at that meeting Microsoft tried to force them into dividing up the browser market, ceding the large Windows segment of that market to Microsoft. The implication is that when Netscape refused, Microsoft opted to carpet the world with free browsers, thus forcing Netscape from the game.

The evidence presented also showed that Netscape has not been "foreclosed" from the market but makes money on its Netcenter portal and other non-browser-related products, Murray said.

Netscape attorneys begged to differ. Christine Varney, a former Federal Trade Commission member and now Netscape attorney, pooh-poohed evidence in a December 1994 E-mail from Clark to Microsoft Vice President Brad Silverberg soliciting an equity investment from Microsoft and offering up Netscape Navigator for Microsoft's use.

"This is another attempt by Microsoft to make fiction out of fact," Varney said.

That December 1994 message should not be relevant, she argued. "The company had not shipped its product, money was running out, and I think [Clark] was a little nervous."

The later June 1995 meeting was in no way related to Clark's message, she said.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll