Google talks up a "hostile, organized campaign against Android." But who's won over mobile developers?

Laurianne McLaughlin, Editor-in-Chief, InformationWeek.com

August 4, 2011

2 Min Read

InformationWeek Now--What's Hot Right Now

InformationWeek Now--What's Hot Right Now

If your product can't kill Android's success with the phone-buying public, can your patents? Microsoft seems to hope so. But Google's had enough and is hitting the court of public opinion. As InformationWeek.com's Thomas Claburn reports, Google SVP and chief legal officer David Drummond Wednesday called the current patent spats "a hostile, organized campaign against Android by Microsoft, Oracle, Apple, and other companies, waged through bogus patents." Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith responded on Twitter by saying, "Google says we bought Novell patents to keep them from Google. Really? We asked them to bid jointly with us. They said no."

Oracle, of course, has gone after Google over Java technology it acquired from Sun. Apple has gone after Android handset makers HTC and Samsung--a battle in which Google may come to HTC's aid. Claburn shares some intriguing analysis of what the patent war means to phone users. Not all the market-watchers think Apple has crushed the field for good. And that's good news if you want a smartphone marketplace with several viable leaders.

Microsoft certainly has not charmed mobile developers: A new survey of 2,000+ developers asked who will dominate enterprise mobile? About 44% of developers say Apple, 44% say Google--but only 7% say Windows Phone 7. What about RIM?

As InformationWeek Contributing Editor Jim Rapoza commented upon the survey results: "It seems to make sense when you think about it. But when I meet with any business user, including those from what one would think are cutting edge companies, the odds are around 70% that their phone will be a Blackberry. Also, as the article points out, the growth of HTML 5 could make what mobile platform one developer [is] for a moot argument."

In other big IT news today, the White House will name a former Microsoft exec, Steven VanRoekel, to replace Vivek Kundra as federal CIO. Kundra leaves his successor with a long to-do list. As InformationWeek.com's J. Nicholas Hoover recently explained, Kundra had the vision but his replacement will need speed.

Laurianne McLaughlin is editor-in-chief for InformationWeek.com. Follow her on Twitter at @lmclaughlin.

At the 2011 InformationWeek 500 Conference, C-level executives from leading global companies will gather to discuss how their organizations are turbo-charging business execution and growth--how their accelerated enterprises manage cash more effectively, invest more wisely, delight customers more consistently, manage risk more profitably. The conference will feature a range of keynote, panel, and workshop sessions. St. Regis Monarch Beach, Calif., Sept. 11-13. Find out more and register.

About the Author(s)

Laurianne McLaughlin

Editor-in-Chief, InformationWeek.com

Laurianne McLaughlin currently serves as InformationWeek.com's Editor-in-Chief, overseeing daily online editorial operations. Prior to joining InformationWeek in May, 2011, she was managing editor at CIO.com. Her writing and editing work has won multiple ASBPE (American Society of Business Publication Editors) awards, including ASBPE's 2010 B2B Web Site of the year award for CIO.com. Previously, McLaughlin served as a senior editor, online for Business 2.0 and as a senior editor for PC World, where she started her technology journalism career in 1992 as a news reporter. She is a graduate of Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism.

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights