iPhone Fingerprint Unlocking Case Raises Constitutional Issue - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile // Mobile Applications

iPhone Fingerprint Unlocking Case Raises Constitutional Issue

As smartphone makers are increasingly adding fingerprint-sensor technology as a log-in feature for their devices, users may be unaware they may lose their right to the Fifth Amendment.

10 iPhone, iPad Apps For Data Nerds
10 iPhone, iPad Apps For Data Nerds
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

On the off-chance law enforcement officials may one day want to peruse through the content loaded on your smartphone, there's a high probability you won't be able to stop them if it has a fingerprint sensor as its log-in.

In other words, you have lost the right to the Fifth Amendment, which guards against self-incrimination. Such was the case for one woman, who was recently targeted by the FBI. The bureau obtained a warrant from a Los Angeles Court to compel her to press her finger against the smartphone and unlock the device, according to a Los Angeles Times report.

Under the Fifth Amendment, one of the provisions states no one "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." For this provision to kick in, however, it applies to law enforcement agencies and the government forcing an individual to make a statement or give "testimony" that could incriminate the individual, notes a report in Wired.

(Image: Rinat_Dasajev/iStockphoto)

(Image: Rinat_Dasajev/iStockphoto)

Pressing a finger against a smartphone's fingerprint reader is not considered a statement or testimony, and is lumped into the category similar to that of compelling a suspect to turnover a key to an airport locker, for example, according to Wired.

But, ironically, the Fifth Amendment would apply if a person were asked to provide his or her password or pin number to their smartphone. That's because it requires the person to make a statement to share such information.

Although the question of smartphone fingerprint readers and privacy is not widespread in the courts, it became a high-profile topic in the San Bernardino terrorist case when the FBI tried to unlock the shooter's iPhone but was initially prevented by its Touch ID.

The topic of Fifth Amendment rights and smartphone fingerprint readers is likely to become more prevalent in the future, however. According to a study by IHS Technology, shipments of fingerprint sensors for smartphones and other mobile devices are expected to soar to 1.6 billion units in 2020, up from 499 million last year.

[Microsoft's Mobile Mayhem: 9 Contributing Factors]

"As more smartphone brands have adopted fingerprint sensors, the market has expanded, and (fingerprint cards) FPC reacted very quickly to the industry's trend, shifting away from swipe sensors," Jamie Fox, a principal analyst with IHS, said in a statement.

He added that ultrasonic fingerprint sensors are the next form of the technology that is expected to soon enter the market. While that version will be even more secure against hacking, it still won't address the issue of the Fifth Amendment.

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
5/3/2016 | 10:43:23 AM
The Fifth amendment and device access
The original intent of the Fifth Amendment is to prevent the government to force innocents to make incriminating statements against themselves, not protecting real criminals, though a necessary byproduct.  It's completely unreasonable to assume innocents would create evidences against themselves, and place the evidences behind passwords or fingerprint recognition devices, so the devices then can be bypassed or opened with provided keys.  

If the fingerprint device entries were to become an issue for the courts to settle, which would side with law enforcements, the passwords, being the keys in question, would unlikely receive continued protection under the Fifth Amendment.
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Becoming a Self-Taught Cybersecurity Pro
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  6/9/2021
Ancestry's DevOps Strategy to Control Its CI/CD Pipeline
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  6/4/2021
IT Leadership: 10 Ways to Unleash Enterprise Innovation
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/8/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Flash Poll