EU Lawmakers Vote For Net Neutrality - InformationWeek
Mobile // Mobile Business
03:45 PM
Connect Directly

EU Lawmakers Vote For Net Neutrality

Telecom reform proposal approved by European lawmakers might limit how service providers can charge customers.

Deadly Downtime: The Worst Network Outages Of 2013
Deadly Downtime: The Worst Network Outages Of 2013
(Click image for larger view and for slideshow.)

The European Parliament on Thursday voted to end mobile device roaming charges by Christmas 2015, part of a package of telecom reforms that might limit the ability of service providers to charge different rates for network traffic.

The members of Parliament voted for the Telecoms Single Market proposal and for a series of amendments offered by the Green, Socialist, and Liberal parties, while rejecting measures advocated by the Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) and favored by network businesses.

Through these amendments, the reforms embrace the concept of "Net neutrality," under which network providers must treat data traffic in a non-discriminatory manner.

Access Now, a European advocacy group, praised the outcome of the vote. "The text adopted today introduces comprehensive measures preserving the open Internet by providing a clear and binding definition of network neutrality," said Estelle Massé, junior policy analyst, in a blog post. "It also provides safeguards against different forms of network discrimination by prohibiting the blocking or throttling of content and services, while also preventing anti-competitive commercial agreements."

[Are service deals the future of the Internet? Read Netflix Deal With Comcast: Net Neutrality Domino?]

The rules allow reasonable, lawful traffic management methods that are proportionate, temporary, and targeted. They also eliminate loopholes in the ITRE proposal that would have allowed ISPs and telcos to exempt certain services from the regulations.

The proposal is due to be reviewed later this year by the Council of  the European Union before it is finalized and adopted as law.

Image: OpenMedia
Image: OpenMedia

Network service providers argue that different network services, such as video, have different data delivery requirements, necessitating different pricing. Net neutrality advocates counter that price variation is often imposed to advance the competitive interests of network providers rather than to cover costs.

In the US, a federal court struck down rules mandating Net neutrality earlier this year, leaving the FCC to reformulate its regulatory approach. That process is ongoing.

In March, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings published a blog post decrying the toll his company has opted to pay to Comcast to preserve service quality and calling for stronger Net neutrality protections.

"Without strong net neutrality, big ISPs can demand potentially escalating fees for the interconnection required to deliver high quality service," wrote Hastings. "The big ISPs can make these demands – driving up costs and prices for everyone else – because of their market position. For any given U.S. household, there is often only one or two choices for getting high-speed Internet* access and that's unlikely to change."

David Cohen, Comcast's executive vice president, characterized Hastings's argument as "hogwash" in a C-SPAN interview and said Netflix initiated the deal.

The Wall Street Journal last month reported that Apple has been negotiating with Comcast for a similar deal that would ensure smooth delivery of Apple TV content.

Can the trendy tech strategy of DevOps really bring peace between developers and IT operations -- and deliver faster, more reliable app creation and delivery? Also in the DevOps Challenge issue of InformationWeek: Execs charting digital business strategies can't afford to take Internet connectivity for granted.

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Li Tan
Li Tan,
User Rank: Ninja
4/3/2014 | 10:59:45 PM
Re: A Great Step Forwards
I think this is a good start. The service provider should provide real value-added service instead of just carrier. The data traffic is part of basic service nowadays and should not be charged on premium rate. In the long run it's good for service provider as well - they need to develop more value-added services instead of just trying to charge subscriber higher for the data transmission channel.
User Rank: Ninja
4/3/2014 | 4:55:09 PM
A Great Step Forwards
I only wish we had similar protections here in the US. What a joy it would be to be able to buy all my paid entertainment on an a la carte basis, and not be dependant on cable TV.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Cybersecurity Strategies for the Digital Era
At its core, digital business relies on strong security practices. In addition, leveraging security intelligence and integrating security with operations and developer teams can help organizations push the boundaries of innovation.
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll