Autonomous Vehicles Vs. Helping Humans Drive Better - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Devices
Commentary
10/29/2015
09:06 AM
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
50%
50%

Autonomous Vehicles Vs. Helping Humans Drive Better

For automakers, creating self-driving cars may be an appealing technical challenge, but creating better-driving cars is a more attainable goal. In a report released today, global consultancy McKinsey suggests that technology for helping drivers navigate is likely to become critical for car buyers.

NASA's Apollo Archive: 10 More Breathtaking Images
NASA's Apollo Archive: 10 More Breathtaking Images
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Trying to create a self-driving car represents an attempt to reinvent the wheel, which in this case happens to be the human brain. Our biological wetware allows us to drive reasonably well. While technology can make us better drivers, taking people out of the picture creates more problems than it solves. The idea that Google, Uber, and other companies believe they can create cars that drive themselves on public roads is remarkable for its hubris.

The issue is not technological. It's social, legal, and practical. Google's self-driving cars have proven themselves, but they don't perform as well when they have to deal with people. People can be unpredictable, and they can also be belligerent, particularly when challenged by machines. As the New York Times reported in September, Dmitri Dolgov, head of software for Google's self-driving car project, said that the challenges of dealing with people on the road convinced him that human drivers needed to be "less idiotic."

When fixing the machines proves too difficult, you have to fix the people. If only that were a viable option!

[How will we connect tomorrow? Read 8 Smart Cities: A Peek At Our Connected Future.]

In his new book, Our Robots, Ourselves, David Mindell, a professor at MIT, argues that machine autonomy is a myth. "Yes, automation can certainly take on parts of tasks previously accomplished by humans, and machines do act on their own in response to their environments for certain periods of time," he writes. "But the machine that operates entirely independent of human direction is a useless machine."

That may be an exaggeration. An automated lighthouse may be limited but it isn't useless. However, Mindell is referring to machines operating in more complicated environments. As he sees it, the future of automation involves some level of human oversight.

Outside of companies that view humans as an obstacle, this is already a given. NASA's Mars rovers operate with a high degree of autonomy, but humans continue to run the show. Commercial airlines can operate on autopilot, but they still rely on human pilots. Defense Department policy requires that people oversee autonomous systems.

Tesla Autopilot
(Image: Tesla)

Tesla Autopilot

(Image: Tesla)

For automakers, creating self-driving cars may be an appealing technical challenge, but creating better-driving cars is a more attainable goal. In a report released today, "Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Pathway to Safer Consumers and Roads," global consultancy McKinsey suggests that technology for helping drivers navigate is likely to become critical for car buyers.

"Assisted driving technologies allow consumers to operate vehicles more safely while the consumers remain ultimately responsible for their respective actions," said Hans-Werner Kaas, senior partner at McKinsey and head of the firm's automotive and assembly practice, in an email. "Such assist technologies provide an 'additional set of eyes' and critical information in all day traffic situations."

McKinsey surveyed 5,500 recent car buyers across China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and the US and found that among the few drivers who already have access to assistive technology, there's high satisfaction and willingness to repurchase.

The firm categorizes advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) in four tiers of escalating complexity:

  • vision assistance (birds-eye view displays, transparent window pillars, night vision displays, and adaptive high beams)
  • warnings and alerts (drowsiness alerts, lane departure warnings, blind spot monitoring, and various collision warnings)
  • adjustments (pre-crash cabin adjustments, braking assistance, lane-changing assistance, and wake-up adjustment)
  • intervention (lane keeping, advanced emergency steering, road hazard avoidance, adaptive cruise control, advanced emergency braking, and pulling over when drowsiness is detected)

Many of these features can be found in current cars such as the 2016 Volvo XC90 and other high-end models. Tesla's version 7.0 software, released earlier this month, implements an autopilot system that can steer within a lane, change lanes on command, and manage speed through traffic awareness.

To facilitate adoption of ADAS technology, McKinsey's report argues, carmakers need to prioritize cyber-security. They need to be transparent about how their systems collect and store data.

"Like with any new technology introduction, car makers and their respective suppliers need to earn or maintain the trust of the consumers," said Kaas, emphasizing the need for testing and validation of the software running assist technologies and for consumer education about potential benefits.

Humans need to engage with and direct their machines, not be driven by them.

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio
We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Author
11/3/2015 | 9:11:58 AM
Re: Road Safety
@mak: People already take naps and, er, take "advanced naps" in traffic.  There would probably still be laws against those things even with automated cars because of the need of a human operator to take over in an emergency (not to mention laws against public indecency in the latter case).
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Author
11/3/2015 | 9:10:20 AM
Re: Road Safety
@SachinEE: Reminds me of a question posed in a book I read when I was a kid: "Would you rather be safe, or would you rather be free?"
mak63
50%
50%
mak63,
User Rank: Ninja
11/1/2015 | 10:10:30 PM
Re: Road Safety
@PedroGonzales "I wouldn't mind taking a nice nap while I'm stuck in traffic."
I wouldn't either, whether is in the AM or PM. Actually, if we think about it, what to do while in an autonomous car is getting bigger and bigger. Can you imagine what a couple would do stuck in traffic with those very dark tinted windows? I can!
PedroGonzales
50%
50%
PedroGonzales,
User Rank: Ninja
11/1/2015 | 11:56:30 AM
Re: Road Safety
@mak63. i think car companies should add more features to support drivers on the road.  I would be once of those drivers that would get a new car with such features.  Since car accident fatalities are high, such features will be a good PR for companies and save people's lives as well.  Something we can all agree is beneficial for the public good. I wouldn't mind taking a nice nap while i'm stuck in traffic.  
shakeeb
50%
50%
shakeeb,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2015 | 11:48:26 PM
Re: Road Safety
@mak63 – Sometimes it's a great relief not having to drive on a rush hour and at times you want to drive on a weekend.  The driver should always be allowed to select the mode they want. 
shakeeb
50%
50%
shakeeb,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2015 | 11:46:25 PM
Re: Road Safety
@mak63 – I think all sports cars should be driven by humans but you could have crash prevention techniques installed. 
mak63
50%
50%
mak63,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2015 | 2:14:58 PM
Re: Road Safety
@shakeeb "...concentrate of much important things"
Yes, a lot of people would like that. Actually, many, many years ago, a friend of mine used to take taxi cabs to go everywhere. The reason was as you just said. More time for thinking, reading, or studying, my friend used to say.

 "some individuals who needs the driving pleasure"

I'm one of them. Nonetheless, in a long commute, on the rush hour, i wouldn't mind the autopilot taking over.
shakeeb
50%
50%
shakeeb,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2015 | 1:05:27 PM
Re: Road Safety
I am wondering if we would have anti-virus software sold for cars. I pray they have strong security to ensure the passengers in the car are safe. Else a remotely controlled car could be the ultimate killing machine. 
shakeeb
50%
50%
shakeeb,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2015 | 1:00:32 PM
Re: Road Safety
@nasimson – Human mind is such that it cannot concentrate on just one thing hence getting everything right for a human is very difficult. I think self-driving cars would do much better to reduce the chance of accidents. 
shakeeb
50%
50%
shakeeb,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2015 | 12:58:09 PM
Re: Road Safety
@mak63 – There are some individuals who needs the driving pleasure, for them I think they need to have the option to turn off the autopilot and drive. 
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Commentary
AI & Machine Learning: An Enterprise Guide
James M. Connolly, Executive Managing Editor, InformationWeekEditor in Chief,  9/27/2018
Commentary
How to Retain Your Best IT Workers
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  9/26/2018
Slideshows
10 Highest-Paying IT Job Skills
Cynthia Harvey, Contributor, NetworkComputing,  9/12/2018
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll