Google Contributor: An Ad-Blocking Alternative - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
9/25/2015
08:06 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Google Contributor: An Ad-Blocking Alternative

For a few dollars per month, you can see fewer ads online while supporting legitimate publishers.

iPad Pro Vs. Competition: What's The Best Business Tablet
iPad Pro Vs. Competition: What's The Best Business Tablet?
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

With Apple's iOS 9 bringing renewed attention to ad blocking, Google's former head of Web spam Matt Cutts suggested Internet users consider an alternative, Google Contributor, a subscription service that enables you to pay for online content with fewer ads.

Google Contributor was introduced as an experiment in November 2014. It offers monthly subscriptions to Google Account holders with a Gmail address at three levels -- $2/month, $5/month, or $10/month. These funds allow the subscriber to compete with advertisers in auctions for ad space when visiting participating websites.

"The more you contribute, the fewer ads you see," said Cutts in a blog post on Thursday. "The handwave-y explanation is that when you go to a website, your monthly subscription actually bids on your behalf in ad auctions."

Winning one of these automated auctions means you get to fill the ad space being presented to you. Google will do so by default with a message that says, "Thank you for being a Contributor" or with a pixel pattern.

(Image: Google)

(Image: Google)

But Cutts observed that subscribers can supply their own HTML for the ad space they've acquired under Contributor's "Advanced settings" menu. "You could replace ads with pictures of kittens or your family," he said. "Or make ads your to-do list, or a reminder to get back to work."

Users of Greasemonkey for Firefox or Tampermonkey for Chrome have long been able to do this, but without the involvement of Google or online publishers.

When Contributor launched, it was available to a small group of participating publishers. But Cutts says it's now open to any US-based website using Google's ad services, specifically AdSense or DoubleClick for Publishers.

Google allows publishers to make some, all, or none of their ad inventory available to bids from Contributor subscribers.

For those bothered by the ethical issues raised by ad blocking -- and many people see no such issues or find justification in the behavior of advertisers -- Google Contributor offers a convenient way to support valued content while seeing fewer unwanted ads.

Contributor falls short of complete ad blocking, however. The $2 tier blocks 5% to 15% of Google ads and has no effect on ads from other providers. The $5 tier blocks 15% to 25% of Google ads, and the $10 tier blocks 25% to 50% of Google ads.

Google's pricing structure suggests $20 per month would be enough to block all Google ads, but that's not an option at present. Asked whether full ad blocking might be an option in the future, a Google spokesperson said in an email, "We're continuing to test Contributor with a number of users and publishers and are very happy with the results so far but don't have more specific plans to share."

On The Down Side

Contributor has other shortcomings. It provides no details about how it deals with privacy and ad tracking -- ad blockers will block analytics, Contributor should do the same. It doesn't work for ads served through mobile apps. And maintaining ad placeholders misses an opportunity to reduce page bloat -- removing ads and their supporting code tends to improve both page appearance and page load times.

Most significantly, Contributor has subscribers paying for ad space rather than content. Why is Google even involved in a transaction that should involve only the publisher and the consumer? 

While it may be in Google's interest to create equivalency between ads and content, they're not the same thing and their values differ. The price of ad space varies with Google's auction system and can go up or down for many different reasons. But Contributor subscribers participate to pay for content, not to auction their attention.

Pricing content isn't easy, but there are ways to do it. Implement a paywall and you'll quickly establish the value of the content -- if no one pays, you know you're charging too much.

Utimately, content is worth what someone will pay for it. But what would you pay for a news article, gossip column, video talk show, or detailed investigative report? It's tough to know before you've viewed it, which makes paywalls challenging. That's where publisher brands come into play.

Paying for ads through Contributor may be a convenient proxy for buying content, but in doing so you're supporting the status quo. By paying for online ads, you're propping up the producers of cynical listicles, cat videos, churnalism, content farms, malvertising, click fraud, intrusive tracking, and unwanted pop-ups. You're paying to sustain the very system that drove people to ad blocking.

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RoseW876
50%
50%
RoseW876,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/8/2015 | 7:05:29 PM
Hope it will be a guaranteed thing, eventually
I think this is a viable alternative to "more ads" and another way to keep top-notch content creators motivated.

I was appalled, however, when I clicked on "Learn More" (on my blog's newly-placed Contributor badge) that a photo of Paul Edmondson, the CEO of HubPages, is shown endorsing? Google Contributor.

I hope Mr. Cutts will consider removing his image and replacing it with an ethical website owner instead – one who doesn't have outstanding complaints filed against him or her with the FTC and Consumer Affairs.
zerox203
50%
50%
zerox203,
User Rank: Ninja
9/26/2015 | 10:36:11 AM
Re: Google Contributor: An Ad-Blocking Alternative
I'm with you, Thomas; They had me until somewhere around the halfway mark. Ten dollars to maybe block half of the ads on some pages/apps, sometimes, if the publisher allows it? That seems a little steep, and the lack of an all-in option (and general mumness on future plans) seems auspicious; streaming video sites like Twitch already offer subscription services, often in the five dollar range, that allow you to see no ads, ever; and that's for multi-minute video ads. Mix in the lack of details on tracking/analytics, the lack of removing that bloat, etc., and it seems like a bit of a halfhearted effort from Google. Still a cool concept, but I think the execution here will prevent it from really catching on.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Cybersecurity Strategies for the Digital Era
At its core, digital business relies on strong security practices. In addition, leveraging security intelligence and integrating security with operations and developer teams can help organizations push the boundaries of innovation.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll