Marriott Pays $600,000 For Jamming WiFi Hotspots - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Mobile // Mobile Devices
09:59 AM
Connect Directly

Marriott Pays $600,000 For Jamming WiFi Hotspots

Marriott International has agreed to settle an FCC complaint regarding blockage of guests' WiFi hotspots.

Cubicle Sins: 10 Coworkers Who Drive You Crazy
Cubicle Sins: 10 Coworkers Who Drive You Crazy
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Marriott International has agreed to pay a $600,000 penalty for jamming guests' mobile WiFi hotspots at a hotel and conference facility in Nashville, Tenn.

In a consent decree filed with the Federal Communications Commission, Marriott acknowledged that "one or more of its employees used containment features of a Wi-Fi monitoring system at the Gaylord Opryland to prevent consumers from connecting to the Internet via their own personal Wi-Fi networks."

At the same time, the FCC says, the hotel was charging consumers, small businesses, and exhibitors from $250 to $1,000 per device to access Marriott's WiFi network.

"Consumers who purchase cellular data plans should be able to use them without fear that their personal Internet connection will be blocked by their hotel or conference center,” said Travis LeBlanc, chief of the FCC's enforcement bureau, in a statement. "It is unacceptable for any hotel to intentionally disable personal hotspots while also charging consumers and small businesses high fees to use the hotel’s own Wi-Fi network."

Asked to elaborate on its WiFi management technology and to explain whether interfering with guests' WiFi was official policy or the unauthorized action of one or more employees, Marriott responded with an emailed statement:

"Marriott has a strong interest in ensuring that when our guests use our Wi-Fi service, they will be protected from rogue wireless hotspots that can cause degraded service, insidious cyber-attacks and identity theft. Like many other institutions and companies in a wide variety of industries, including hospitals and universities, the Gaylord Opryland protected its Wi-Fi network by using FCC-authorized equipment provided by well-known, reputable manufacturers. We believe that the Gaylord Opryland's actions were lawful. We will continue to encourage the FCC to pursue a rulemaking in order to eliminate the ongoing confusion resulting from today's action and to assess the merits of its underlying policy."

The FCC was unable to immediately provide details about the specific technology used by Marriott to block guests' WiFi hotspots.

Ruckus Wireless lists Marriott as one of several large hotel groups that have deployed its ZoneFlex WiFi management system. ZoneFlex has the capability to interfere with rogue network access points, as do other networking products, such as those from Cisco. Cisco defines rogue devices as those that share a network operator's spectrum but aren't managed by the network operator.

Cisco's documentation on "rogue containment" -- kicking people off your network or off neighboring networks -- notes, "Containment can have legal implications when launched against neighboring networks." Indeed, rogue containment conducted against someone else's network looks a lot like a denial-of-service attack, an act that could be prosecuted as a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Ruckus Wireless did not respond to requests to confirm whether ZoneFlex is used at Marriott's Gaylord Opryland.

Willful or malicious interference with radio network signals is illegal under Section 333 of the Communications Act of 1934. Describing the fine as appropriate for the circumstances, a senior FCC official confirmed that the agency has become more interested in the public's ability to connect to the Internet as mobile hotspots have become more commonplace. The consent decree notes the "growing use" of technology that interferes with personal WiFi networks.

The FCC began showing a greater interest in jamming technology in 2007 when the trickle of enforcement actions against people selling illegal signal jamming devices became a deluge. There were 30 enforcement actions filed that year, compared to 0 in 2006, 3 in 2005, and 2 in 2004.

Two years ago, the agency established a tip line for people to report the sale of illegal cell phone, GPS, or other signal jammers (e.g. radar jammers). Having initially focused on sellers of jamming devices, the agency has stepped up its pursuit of individuals who use jamming devices.

The penalty for marketing jamming devices in the US is steep: up to $16,000 for each violation or each day of a continuing violation, and up to $112,500 for a single violation, seizure of the unlawful equipment, and criminal sanctions including imprisonment. But individuals who use jammers face stiff fines too: In April, the FCC found Florida resident Jason R. Humphreys liable for a $48,000 for operating a cell phone jammer during his commute to work over a 16-24 month period.

If the world wasn't changing, we might continue to view IT purely as a service organization, and ITSM might be the most important focus for IT leaders. But it's not, it isn't, and it won't be -- at least not in its present form. Get the Research: Beyond IT Service Management report today. (Free registration required.)

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
10/5/2014 | 1:22:15 PM
Re: Customer's free choice
I really don't understand why a hotel such as Marriott would intentionally force their consumers to use their WiFi(even blocking their cell phone carrier service).  I agree that consumers should have a choice as to whether they want to use the hotel's WiFi. I agree for individuals whom work with security or top executives, they need to make sure that their data is secure as they travel.  I'm surprise that Marriott didn't even announce this to their quests prior to making their reservations, if they are blocking my internet, what they should at least do is inform in advance.   
User Rank: Ninja
10/5/2014 | 2:41:47 AM
Re: Customer's free choice
Agreed, it is nice to protect a consumer and to make the network secure. This could make the cost of Wi-Fi to be higher in a hotel environment and certain types of business travelers (like CEOs) might even require security standards that cost $2,000 per device for connectivity. However, at the end of the day the consumer needs to decide whether they would like to use their personal connectivity or one offered by the hotel.
Li Tan
Li Tan,
User Rank: Ninja
10/4/2014 | 11:14:09 AM
Customer's free choice
It should be up to customer's free choice whether or not to use and pay for the WiFi in hotel, which will normally cost a lot. Jamming and blocking the resident's own WiFi is not acceptable. The WiFi service provided by hotel should be optional and cannot be made compulsory.
AI Regulation: Has the Time Arrived?
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  2/24/2020
Fighting the Coronavirus with Analytics and GIS
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  2/3/2020
IT Careers: 10 Job Skills in High Demand This Year
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  2/3/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
IT Careers: Tech Drives Constant Change
Advances in information technology and management concepts mean that IT professionals must update their skill sets, even their career goals on an almost yearly basis. In this IT Trend Report, experts share advice on how IT pros can keep up with this every-changing job market. Read it today!
Flash Poll