What's worse, Balsillie goes on to say that the blackout was completely avoidable. "It was a process error that we had that's been fixed. It wasn't a corruption of any form of the infrastructure, and that's very important. We're clearly putting a lot more fault tolerance into the system, a lot more capacity. We're having domain failover architectures; we're having business continuity solutions experts, so from that component piece of the infrastructure, that's not going to happen again."
Balsillie chooses his words a little bit more carefully here. The end message is that RIM knows it screwed up, fixed the problem, and is confident it will not experience a similar problem in the future. Great. Does anyone really believe this?
I can't.
What cracks me up most, is that Balsillie mentions that enterprises are responsible for their own contingency plans in the event of any communication failures. While I don't disagree, does this mean that we shouldn't count on RIM?