Vista, Schmista - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Mobile
Commentary
1/17/2007
05:35 PM
Eric Ogren
Eric Ogren
Commentary
50%
50%

Vista, Schmista

Last week while working the press room at CES I was afforded a sneak peek at Microsoft's new operating system, Vista. I have to be honest here and say that I was not all that impressed.

Last week while working the press room at CES I was afforded a sneak peek at Microsoft's new operating system, Vista. I have to be honest here and say that I was not all that impressed.With Vista's launch imminent (January 30th), I was pleased to have an opportunity to check out the OS before it hits shelves. As you can tell from my intro, it's nothing to write home about.

The problem is, it retains a lot of WinXP's faults: The menus, the folders, the menus, the base Windows code, oh, and did I mention the menus? Sure, Vista is sorta pretty and fluid-like, with windows expanding and collapsing in a very Apple-esque way, but there's no testament to its solidity. Will it crash as often as any of the previous iterations did? Unfortunately there's no real information yet. Vista was released to corporate customers back in November, and there hasn't been a lot of news either way.

There was news from hackers, of course, who found major back doors to Windows security as recently as, oh, look, today!

As a Mac and Windows user, my disdain for using Windows has only grown since Apple released OS X 5 years ago. Its beauty, fluidity and solidity have earned it a place in my will (seriously, I am donating money to Apple when I die.). The OS simply works, probably in part due to its Unix core. Solid functionality all the way, even it isn't entirely enterprise friendly.

I remember when Windows 95 first came out, it was being called Mac OS 86, as it called upon the most important features of that ancient OS and rebranded them with the Windows logo and attempted to pass the whole package off as a brand new operating system. Still, it was leaps and bounds better than Windows 3.x, though the Blue Screen of Death was a nice carry-over.

Here we are 12 years later, and Microsoft is pulling the same schtick. It's leaving the real innovation up to its competitors and is leveraging that knowledge in its own products. That's right, Vista is Mac OS X 2001, not-so-cleverly disguised as a wholly different OS.

The bottom line for enterprises that are interested in upgrading to the new system is to take the wait-and-see approach.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
Slideshows
Flash Poll