NetIQ Aims To Balance Simplicity, Flexibility - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
Software // Enterprise Applications
News
9/20/2007
02:15 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
RELATED EVENTS
Faster, More Effective Response With Threat Intelligence & Orchestration Playboo
Aug 31, 2017
Finding ways to increase speed, accuracy, and efficiency when responding to threats should be the ...Read More>>

NetIQ Aims To Balance Simplicity, Flexibility

The latest entry in our APM Rolling Review, AppManager tries to keep up with the rapid-fire pace of change on today's networks without descending into complexity.

THE UPSHOT
CLAIM:  NetIQ AppManager seeks to monitor, report on, and diagnose application problems common to enterprise networks. With AppManager, NetIQ is looking to make application performance management an efficient process by balancing ease of installation and use for fast ROI, with the ability to customize the product to keep pace with change.

CONTEXT:  AppManager was introduced in 1996 and is one of the first Windows application agents. NetIQ has stayed true to form and expanded on what it does best with AppManager 7. The product competes against appliance-based and agentless synthetic transaction systems. See other rolling reviews of APM competitors.

CREDIBILITY:  While NetIQ touts the ease of deploying, maintaining, and configuring agents in AppManager 7, organizations with multiple domains may have some hiccups. We saw advances in the product's visualization capabilities, most notably Service Maps, but IT will need to invest possibly considerable time to manually build and maintain these.

NetIQ has been in the APM game longer than most, but it's being challenged by a huge roster of rival application performance management vendors. And no wonder: This is a growth market, according to Forrester Research, which expects vendors to net almost $2.1 billion by year's end. Seems there's no time to waste on sluggish apps.

One challenge for new and established vendors alike is keeping their APM products easy to use in the face of increasing network complexity, while still providing for customization. NetIQ's AppManager 7, part of the NetIQ AppManager Suite, uses agents to provide monitoring, reporting, analysis, diagnostics, and resolution of common application issues. It mostly succeeds on the ease-of-use front, as we found in our testing. To further enhance the product's appeal, NetIQ offers optional modules geared toward monitoring such technologies as IBM WebSphere, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, and VMware ESX Server. We also evaluated NetIQ's Analysis Center, using it to analyze performance data and run complex reports.

INVISIBLE TOUCH

NetIQ advertises a zero-touch capability that lets administrators deploy agents from a central console. For this feature to work, however, the management server needed to be in an Active Directory domain with the client systems. Unfortunately for us, our test bed is distributed, so we had to install our agents manually.

We were most interested in trying out AppManager's ability to monitor end-to-end transactions, and we weren't disappointed. We configured AppManager to monitor a multitiered application, end to end, using a combination of synthetic transactions and an agent that looked at the performance of both the overall system and individual applications, such as Web servers and databases. NetIQ's Knowledge Scripts are the main technology behind AppManager monitoring. Knowledge Scripts are VB or Perl scripts that contain instructions for the agent to gather the data being requested. They ship with a number of preset thresholds to report performance problems and faults. Thresholds can be adjusted to suit your needs, but we found a lot to get started with right out of the box.

InformationWeek Reports

AppManager ably reported on specific performance issues related to multiple independent components, including our Web and database servers, and placed discrete issues into the context of a logical application. It also did a very good job identifying specific problems, such as the failure of a process or step of a synthetic transaction. However, putting these alerts into the context of an application failure required manual intervention. Whether this will qualify as onerous depends on how complicated your application infrastructure is.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
[Interop ITX 2017] State Of DevOps Report
[Interop ITX 2017] State Of DevOps Report
The DevOps movement brings application development and infrastructure operations together to increase efficiency and deploy applications more quickly. But embracing DevOps means making significant cultural, organizational, and technological changes. This research report will examine how and why IT organizations are adopting DevOps methodologies, the effects on their staff and processes, and the tools they are utilizing for the best results.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
IT Strategies to Conquer the Cloud
Chances are your organization is adopting cloud computing in one way or another -- or in multiple ways. Understanding the skills you need and how cloud affects IT operations and networking will help you adapt.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll