Privacy Groups Threaten To Boycott Intel - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
News

Privacy Groups Threaten To Boycott Intel

As Intel prepares for the Feb. 26 launch of its Pentium III processor, privacy groups are threatening to boycott Intel for putting a unique serial identification number on each chip; they're also asking the Federal Trade Commission to take action. The groups charge that the number on each Pentium III could be seen remotely by marketers or anyone else who might want to eavesdrop on a user's browsing habits.

Due to concerns by the Electronic Privacy Information Center and Junkbusters Corp., Intel decided two weeks ago that PC vendors could sell their systems with the processor ID turned off in a default mode. Users would then have the option to turn it on through controls in the operating system.

Intel gave each processor an ID number because of numerous requests from IS managers, a spokesman says. It is designed to help IS managers more easily keep track of PCs and identify remote users in large group communications over the Internet in instances where a password may have slipped into the wrong hands.

But the privacy groups are not pleased with the arrangement. "It's out of Intel's hands," says Jason Catlett, president of Junkbusters in Green Brook, N.J. "It's up to the PC manufacturers and Microsoft." Catlett, who is also encouraging other activist groups to lobby the FTC, is concerned that software makers will want the ID turned on for copyright protection. "Software would be installed for a particular machine," he says. "So if you move your hard drive to another machine, it won't run."

He also charges that it will be difficult for users to turn the ID off and on without rebooting. But Intel is promising a download that will solve that problem.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll