Feds Fall Short On IT Project Management - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Leadership
News
11/28/2012
02:21 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Feds Fall Short On IT Project Management

Government agencies, including Health and Human Services, do a poor job of following federal IT investment guidelines, reports Government Accountability Office.

6 HIE Vendors: How They Measure Up
6 HIE Vendors: How They Measure Up
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Health and Human Services (HHS) are doing a mediocre job of following Office of Management and Budget (OMB) IT investment guidelines, while the Department of Defense (DoD), the Treasury and Veterans Affairs (VA) have fallen short when it comes to developing policies and performing analyses of ongoing IT investments, according to a new report released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

The report, "Agencies Need to Strengthen Oversight of Billions of Dollars in Operations and Maintenance Investments," looked at these five government agencies, which spend a combined $37 billion out of the $55 billion allotted for government IT systems in acquisition or development. The report gauged whether these investments add value to the agency and if there are more cost-effective ways to perform these IT initiatives.

In an interview with InformationWeek Healthcare, David Powner, director of IT issues at GAO, explained that his agency set out to assess these five agencies on OMB's basic requirements for operations and maintenance systems. For example, OMB guidelines call for agencies to develop an operational analysis policy and for the federal agencies to perform analyses annually to ensure steady-state investments continue to meet agency needs. The guidance also includes 17 key factors -- areas like cost, schedule, customer satisfaction and innovation -- that should be addressed in these analyses.

[ To see how patient engagement can help transform medical care, check out 5 Healthcare Tools To Boost Patient Involvement. ]

"We took a sample of 75 investments in these five agencies and broke our findings down into two areas," Powner explained. "The Department of Homeland Security and HHS have policies in place to do these operational analyses for their systems on an annual basis." But when it came to DHS and HHS performing these analyses annually, Powner said the results were a "mixed bag ... not all the investments were getting all the analyses." HHS, for example, analyzed seven of its eight investments in IT, but not all key factors in the OMB guidelines were addressed. "So the DHS and HHS answered everything partially," Powner said.

On the flip side, Powner continued, the DoD, the VA and the Treasury not only didn't have policies in place in 2011, but none performed analyses asked by the OMB. The bottom line for all five agencies, Powner said, is that all need to first develop policies and then conduct analyses on an ongoing basis. "They need to make sure they're getting it done in a more comprehensive manner," he said.

In terms of costs, Powner added, approximately $3 billion worth of investments across the five agencies didn't receive analysis. "The question was, is this $3 billion being wisely spent on these systems, or is there is a better way to do it?" he said. "Billions of dollars were going un-assessed on these systems; we wanted to make sure these systems meet mission value and were done in the most appropriate manner."

The GAO also made recommendations to OMB to help with OMB's "oversight and transparency," Powner said. "There's an IT dashboard that provides transparency on investments across the government ... [W]e suggested to OMB for agencies [to include a link] to their latest investment in IT operations. That way, they can see what investments are getting an appropriate look or not."

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
jaysimmons
50%
50%
jaysimmons,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/5/2012 | 8:08:59 PM
re: Feds Fall Short On IT Project Management
I find it troublesome, although not that surprising, that such large investments were going unchecked during annual accountability reports. As the US faces major economic uncertainty, it only makes sense that we scrutinize our spending and make sure that the funds being spent for new IT investments are being utilized correctly and are going towards programs that meet certain key factors: cost, schedule, customer satisfaction, innovation, etc. Tightening down on these efforts will either force programs to become more effective or shift money to better programs.

Jay Simmons
InformationWeek Contributor
Commentary
Will AI and Machine Learning Break Cloud Architectures?
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/10/2019
Slideshows
9 Steps Toward Ethical AI
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  5/15/2019
Commentary
Humans' Fascination with Artificial General Intelligence
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  6/6/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
A New World of IT Management in 2019
This IT Trend Report highlights how several years of developments in technology and business strategies have led to a subsequent wave of changes in the role of an IT organization, how CIOs and other IT leaders approach management, in addition to the jobs of many IT professionals up and down the org chart.
Slideshows
Flash Poll