Meaningful Use Needs Patient Safety Reports, Say Experts - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Healthcare // Analytics
News
11/15/2011
10:16 AM
50%
50%

Meaningful Use Needs Patient Safety Reports, Say Experts

Contributors to the Institute of Medicine's report on health IT say that Meaningful Use regs should require submission of electronic health record data on adverse events.

12 Innovative Mobile Healthcare Apps
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: 12 Innovative Mobile Healthcare Apps
Hard on the heels of an Institute of Medicine report on regulating the safety of electronic health records (EHRs) and related health IT tools, Ashish K. Jha, MD, and David C. Classen, MD, two of the report's coauthors, called for patient safety measures to be included in Meaningful Use requirements. In a New England Journal of Medicine article, they also proposed that certified EHRs be required to have modules for documenting adverse events.

Citing several studies showing that hospital safety has not improved significantly in the past decade, Jha and Classen argued, "The primary reason for insufficient progress is the lack of a robust measurement program: there are still no nationally agreed-on methods for systematically identifying, tracking, and reporting adverse events."

If there were reliable, standardized measures and clinical data on adverse events were documented in EHRs, these experts contended, real advances in safety might occur. Just as quality measurement has improved the quality of inpatient care in some ways, measurement of adverse events could also contribute to better safety.

[For background on e-prescribing tools, see 6 E-Prescribing Vendors To Watch.]

The data on adverse events could be exported from EHRs to the patient safety organizations (PSOs) that now collect such data from hospitals on behalf of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), said Classen in an interview with InformationWeek Healthcare. That is also the mechanism that the IOM recommends for safety reporting in general, he noted. In addition, he said, hospitals could use the data in their own safety improvement programs.

But why would hospitals and physicians want to expose themselves to liability by documenting adverse events in an EHR, even if it were required for Meaningful Use?

Classen responded by noting that forthcoming studies will show that adverse events in the hospital are correlated with an increased length of stay, an increased mortality risk, and a heightened risk of having another adverse event during the same hospitalization. Also, he noted, having an inpatient adverse event increases one's chance of readmission at 30 days, six months, and a year.

So, if hospitals want to form accountable care organizations or take bundled payments, he said, a high rate of adverse events will cost them money by increasing length of stay, readmissions, and the amount of post-discharge care provided. Moreover, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will penalize them for excessive readmissions and factor inpatient complications into their reimbursement under CMS' value-based purchasing program. All of this gives hospitals a strong incentive to improve their safety performance, he said.

As for the liability risk, he noted, the EHR-generated data could be de-identified and pooled for reporting purposes.

Classen agreed with Mark Chassin, president of the Joint Commission, that the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's patient safety indicators-- some of which CMS recently published on its HospitalCompare website--are "dangerously flawed" because they're based on billing data. In a recent study, Classen noted, he and other researchers found that these measures picked up less than 10% of the adverse events.

Clinical data is much better for measuring and analyzing safety issues, Classen said. "Once you have an EHR in place, you could relatively easily leverage that to detect these safety problems in real time."

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DoctorBase
50%
50%
DoctorBase,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/15/2011 | 9:12:26 PM
re: Meaningful Use Needs Patient Safety Reports, Say Experts
Will there be a tie into NCHQ measurements? Also wonder how this will affect ACOs (once they're up and running) if EHR/EMR records are obligated to adverse effects module. It's a good idea, but not sure how I feel about Fed mandates for software developers. Don't tell me what to develop!!
News
The State of Chatbots: Pandemic Edition
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  9/10/2020
Commentary
Deloitte on Cloud, the Edge, and Enterprise Expectations
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  9/14/2020
Slideshows
Data Science: How the Pandemic Has Affected 10 Popular Jobs
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  9/9/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
IT Automation Transforms Network Management
In this special report we will examine the layers of automation and orchestration in IT operations, and how they can provide high availability and greater scale for modern applications and business demands.
Slideshows
Flash Poll