Medical Experts Pitch Controversial Health IT Safety Plan - InformationWeek
Government // Leadership
09:45 AM
Building Security for the IoT
Nov 09, 2017
In this webcast, experts discuss the most effective approaches to securing Internet-enabled system ...Read More>>

Medical Experts Pitch Controversial Health IT Safety Plan

Stakeholders debate Institute of Medicine proposal for federal oversight of IT-associated patient deaths and injuries.

Healthcare IT Vendor Directory
Slideshow: Healthcare IT Vendor Directory
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
An Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, released this week, that calls for establishment of an independent federal entity to investigate patient deaths and serious injuries associated with health IT has garnered mixed reviews.

On the one hand, many healthcare stakeholders applaud the report's call to oversee development of health IT as a way to bolster patient safety. But many are also wondering why these safety issues are raised now, after billions of dollars have already been spent installing health IT systems.

"It seems to me that it is quite remarkable that we're in this situation," Dr. Richard Cook, associate professor at the University of Chicago's department of anesthesia and critical care, said Thursday during a webcast held by IOM to discuss the report. Cook went on to say, "the idea that you have to wait until you've invested $30 billion in something to discover that it isn't working very well is clearly a nonstarter."

[For background on e-prescribing tools, see 6 E-Prescribing Vendors To Watch.]

The IOM report, Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care, concludes that health IT can improve the quality of healthcare delivery, but the current literature is inconclusive regarding the overall impact of health IT on patient safety. The report also said stakeholders must coordinate their efforts to better understand the risks associated with health IT and improve its safe design, implementation, and use.

Among its recommendations: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary Kathleen Sebelius should publish an action and surveillance plan within 12 months to work with the private sector to assess the impact of health IT on patient safety and minimize risks associated with its implementation and use. Then if the secretary concludes that progress toward improving safety is insufficient within a year, the Food and Drug Administration should regulate these technologies. Alongside HHS' efforts, the FDA should take initial steps to develop a framework for potential regulation of EHRs, health information exchanges, and personal health records so that the agency is ready to act if necessary.

The report also said that HHS should:

-- recommend that Congress establish an independent federal entity for investigating patient safety deaths, serious injuries, or potentially unsafe conditions associated with health IT;

-- ensure that health IT vendors facilitate the free flow of information; and

-- fund a new health IT safety council to evaluate the criteria for assessing and monitoring the safe use of health IT.

But in reaction to the IOM's concerns about IT safety, Cook said, "It is not surprising that such events are now being discovered in health IT. What is surprising is that those creating and promoting these large systems have neither anticipated them or look for them ... Development of [health IT] is marked by an optimism about the effects of IT that are unwarranted and naive, and the willingness to embrace this optimism, to the extent that making largescale investments in these systems and only later asking what their impact might be on patient safety, borders on recklessness."

Ashish Jha, associate professor of health policy and management at Harvard University's school of public health, countered Cook's argument saying that it's difficult to assess what the health IT risks are unless the systems are implemented and being used.

"When nobody has these health IT systems it's really hard to study how they're being used. Now that the implementation has happened, ... now [is] the time to really begin to study this in earnest, and I think our committee's report was very clear that this is the kind of information that we need now to help make the system safer," Jha said.

Cook shot back, "Nothing could be further from the truth; we do that for many, many systems with safe software," Cook said. One does not have to "put things out in the field and then wait to see whether or not they work. Nobody bothered to look, it's that simple," he said.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Lisa Henderson
Lisa Henderson,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/11/2011 | 8:31:02 PM
re: Medical Experts Pitch Controversial Health IT Safety Plan
I am assuming #1 that they mean to establish an entity to investigate patient deaths and injuries as discovered by health IT? And then further it says the FDA should regulate these technologies. FDA has no money now, seriously, where do they think they are going to get the money to do that?

There are a plethora of initiatives and databases that are either mining or looking to ways to assess patient safety at various points of a person's health, clinical trials, postmarketing of drugs and devices; claims databases, collaborations etc. The point is not to have one more. The point is to figure out what you've got and go with it.

But I may be missing the point here if someone could enlighten me....

Lisa Henderson, InformationWeek Healthcare, contributing editor
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Digital Transformation Myths & Truths
Transformation is on every IT organization's to-do list, but effectively transforming IT means a major shift in technology as well as business models and culture. In this IT Trend Report, we examine some of the misconceptions of digital transformation and look at steps you can take to succeed technically and culturally.
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll