What IG Overlooked In State Dept. Facebook Flare-up - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Government // Leadership
11:54 AM
Connect Directly

What IG Overlooked In State Dept. Facebook Flare-up

Inspector General's slap at State Department bureau for spending $630,000 on Facebook Likes misses important lessons of social media's role.

This is not what the State Department did. Rather, what the State Department actually did was roll out a social media campaign. This is not unlike a communications campaign that, for example, the Office of National Drug Control Policy might have done toward keeping young people away from drugs. Nearly every large organization, whether public or private, has rolled out such campaigns in one form or another.

This is what contributes to a brand -- whether it's a public or private institution. Most of us probably would not consider this newsworthy. But given that Facebook is a social media platform with over a billion users -- if it were a country, it would be the world's third largest -- we as a society make Facebook "newsworthy".

Second, establishing a social media policy and then implementing it with specific measurable goals takes time, a lot of time -- unless of course a notable personal brand steps up, like Hillary Clinton the citizen not the former Secretary of State, and gets hundreds of thousands of Twitter followers within days. A brand can endeavor to accelerate the pace of getting followers or Likes through purchasing Facebook ads but a typical brand won't see rapid growth like that of a celebrity even if they buy Facebook ads.

It's important to note here that a typical Facebook audience only sees 16% of what a Facebook brand (person or organization) posts. So it stands to reason that those interested in getting more of their messages read by more people would buy ads to up their odds and increase their brand awareness.

Buying Facebook ads can increase how many times Facebook decides to put your post into the news stream which in turn increases your visibility and finally that could lead to more Likes.

But this is not akin to buying Likes. Without going into the weeds, what the State Department did is not illegal, immoral or quite frankly, not newsworthy. Social media is one more tool available today in an advertising campaign. Advertising is not free. Typically, the way an organization determines its social media goal is how it's inextricably linked to their overall business goals or to their overarching public relations goals.

The heart of social media is getting people to know, like and trust your brand. Again, a brand is something we all as individuals have, as do our public and private institutions. People will talk about an organization's brand whether an organization has a strategy or has no strategy. In this era of transparency, most organizations choose to have a strategy and dialogue with their targeted audience. In other words, the world is talking and we need to have meaningful engagement with our targeted audience in order to cultivate relationships.

Think of Facebook like a gated community for nice people. Facebook has to approve your ads. Some organizations will do unethical things such as redirecting a link to another page after Facebook approved the ad. That's not a good idea. If Facebook finds out you're doing that they'll ban you.

My advice is that successful campaigns need to play nice and reflect a desire to help make the world a more likable place. The IG recommendation that IIP's digital outreach focus more on public diplomacy goals rather than raw numbers of social media fans is a universal reminder to us all that it's so much more than just the Likes. The merits of IIP's social media actions, from my view, does show a commitment to the broader goal toward enhancing public diplomacy, and not just buying Likes.

At the same time, its campaign also serves as a helpful reminder that especially in the climate of U.S. diplomatic policy, we can and should be offering quality content, meaningful engagement and working toward a more likable United States of America.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
2 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
David F. Carr
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
8/13/2013 | 1:36:48 PM
re: What IG Overlooked In State Dept. Facebook Flare-up
Is $630,000 really an outrageous sum on the scale of a government agency budget? If they continued spending at that rate, sure that would be a problem. But if they were using it to kick start the audience for the FB page, I'd say the real question was how well they followed through on it, to make some deeper connection with that audience and achieve more organic growth going forward.
User Rank: Apprentice
8/12/2013 | 5:39:43 PM
re: What IG Overlooked In State Dept. Facebook Flare-up
It's a classic misstep that many businesses make. Sure, "likes" can be bought, but what matters more is the level of engagement your page generates. Engagement has a direct correlation to how often your posts are seen in your fans' news feeds. Get your engagement numbers up first, then acquire more fans when your strategy is working. If your posts aren't being seen by your fans, the money you've spent acquiring them is wasted.
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
8/12/2013 | 5:08:55 PM
re: What IG Overlooked In State Dept. Facebook Flare-up
Surely there are better uses for tax dollars than buying Facebook ads.
User Rank: Author
8/12/2013 | 2:49:53 PM
re: What IG Overlooked In State Dept. Facebook Flare-up
Personally, I couldn't care less if these Likes are real or fabricated. International diplomacy shouldn't be a popularity contest. The most popular policies and people don't always "win." The author states: "We can and should be offering quality content, meaningful engagement and working toward a more likable United States of America." I wouldn't be so concerned about that last point. Do what's right and in the best interests of your nation and its citizens, without trampling on the rights of other nations. That's what leadership is all about. Neville Chamberlain was a likable chap in the 1930s. Winston Churchill was a pariah.
10 Ways to Transition Traditional IT Talent to Cloud Talent
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  11/23/2020
Top 10 Data and Analytics Trends for 2021
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  11/13/2020
Can Low Code Measure Up to Tomorrow's Programming Demands?
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  11/16/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Why Chatbots Are So Popular Right Now
In this IT Trend Report, you will learn more about why chatbots are gaining traction within businesses, particularly while a pandemic is impacting the world.
Flash Poll