7 Linux Facts That Will Surprise You - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software
News
2/24/2015
07:10 PM
Charles Babcock
Charles Babcock
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

7 Linux Facts That Will Surprise You

Here are seven things we bet you didn't know about Linux and why it remains a software project of historic proportions.
Previous
1 of 9
Next

(Image: Openclips via Pixabay)

(Image: Openclips via Pixabay)

In the 20 years since Linux 1.0 first appeared, the open source operating system has become one of the major winners in the enterprise data center, alongside Microsoft Windows. Linux also has a presence on the public Internet and in public cloud services.

But we don't hear a lot about the ongoing development of Linux. In 2007, Linus Torvalds and the other Linux kernel committers were adding patches to the kernel at the rate of 86 per hour, or 1.43 per minute. InformationWeek reported in 2007 that Linux, then 16 years old, was the largest sustained software project in the world. Dan Frye, an IBM VP who tracked it, then said: "No other open source project has gotten this large or moved this fast. It's a first-of-a-kind developer community."

At the time, InformationWeek asked whether any open source project could maintain the discipline and manage the flood of outside contributions from a constantly rotating list of contributors that had characterized the progress of Linux up to that point. It was clear at the Linux Collaboration Summit in Santa Rosa, Calif., last week, that the pace of support for Linux has not only been sustained, but has picked up in those intervening years.

On the following pages, we share seven things we learned at the annual Linux Collaboration Summit that you probably don't know about the modern version of Linux, including how it remains the world's largest sustained software project.

Charles Babcock is an editor-at-large for InformationWeek and author of Management Strategies for the Cloud Revolution, a McGraw-Hill book. He is the former editor-in-chief of Digital News, former software editor of Computerworld and former technology editor of Interactive ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Previous
1 of 9
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
MarkS229
50%
50%
MarkS229,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/25/2015 | 11:54:42 PM
Re: Tinification
If the objective is to reduce the size of the kernel, why not follow SunOs 4.1.4, and include the optional kernel modules (mainly drivers, I assume) as object modules, which the user can statically link with the kernel. The distribution already contains the linker/loader, so a simple modifiable shell script would be all that is needed.
Nemos
50%
50%
Nemos,
User Rank: Strategist
2/25/2015 | 6:31:40 PM
App?
While I am writing these lines I am using a Linux system as Ubuntu is, and I can state that the developing rhythm of the Kernel should be synchronized with the developing process of the supporting applications and in this field the results are not good. Sometimes it is really annoying that very good software programs do not have the relative Linux version.
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
2/25/2015 | 5:21:41 PM
Linux bug rate compares favorably to other projects
That's a fair question, Tom. Jon Corbet's report summarized numbers of defects but I didn't see a ratio. So I turned to Coverity, which scans open source projects for defects and found it rates core Linux kernel code at .61 defects per 1,000 lines. Any rate equal to 1.0 or less is considered "good quality software." The .61 for the kernel (excluding drivers) compares to an average .59 for open source projects overall. That's pretty good because the rate of errors goes up with the size of the project. It's latest report covers Linux through the end of 2013. It doesn't address 2014. Open source in general has lower ratios than commercial code.
hho927
50%
50%
hho927,
User Rank: Ninja
2/25/2015 | 5:09:58 PM
Minix Coppied.
It was a rewrite of Minix.

Tanenbaum created Minix but his limitation (education only/the source codes were only available to university students) killed it.

Linux caught on fire because it gave free source codes, free distribution, you can make money with it. There is almost no limitation except if you change it you have to give your codes back.

At the beginning, it was just people who want to learn(OSes) + hobbyists. Then companies figured out how to make money with it. Then the rest is history.

If they could not monetize Linux, I don't think it's here today.

BTW: Tanenbaum later tried Linux way but it's too little, too late.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
2/25/2015 | 3:23:47 PM
Re: Is OpenStack bigger?
How does the Linux kernal error rate per thousand lines of code compare with other projects? Is it significantly better or worse?
mak63
50%
50%
mak63,
User Rank: Ninja
2/25/2015 | 2:32:31 PM
Introduction to the Linux
To those interested, rdX (edx.org) offers a free Linux course. According to the site, to cover all the material will take anywhere from 40 to 60 hours.

I was thinking to take it, just to do a refresh. You never know when you're gonna need it.
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
2/25/2015 | 12:31:50 PM
Is OpenStack bigger?
Oops. Just saw a claim for the OpenStack Project that it now consists of 20 million lines of code.
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
2/25/2015 | 12:27:59 PM
Linux kernel = Linus' Unix
the Linux community has been accused by Richard Stallman of ignoring the contributions to the operating system from the Free Software Foundation's Gnu tools and components. But many Linux builders and contributors freely acknowledge Gnu pioneered major operating system comjonents. But the kernel remains a new creation, not indebted to other sources other than the precedents and example that Unix set. To my mind, Linux remains Linus' Unix. The penguin mascot, Tux, is an acronym for Torvald's Unix.
Mr LeslieS100
100%
0%
Mr LeslieS100,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/25/2015 | 9:36:37 AM
Proof reading
Does anyone ever proof read the text before posting.

 

Million of lines    (of what)

Kernal as mistyping/spelling for kernel.

 

Please, its distracting when there are annoyances. We think of them, rather than the message.
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
News
8 AI Trends in Today's Big Enterprise
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  9/11/2019
Slideshows
IT Careers: 10 Places to Look for Great Developers
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  9/4/2019
Commentary
Cloud 2.0: A New Era for Public Cloud
Crystal Bedell, Technology Writer,  9/1/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
State of the Cloud
State of the Cloud
Cloud has drastically changed how IT organizations consume and deploy services in the digital age. This research report will delve into public, private and hybrid cloud adoption trends, with a special focus on infrastructure as a service and its role in the enterprise. Find out the challenges organizations are experiencing, and the technologies and strategies they are using to manage and mitigate those challenges today.
Video
Current Issue
Data Science and AI in the Fast Lane
This IT Trend Report will help you gain insight into how quickly and dramatically data science is influencing how enterprises are managed and where they will derive business success. Read the report today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll