Ballmer: Linux No Longer A Cancer - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software

Ballmer: Linux No Longer A Cancer

Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, who infamously once declared Linux a "cancer," has now had a change of heart and applauded the company's latest moves to embrace the open source platform.

10 Cool Microsoft Garage Projects You Didn't Know About
10 Cool Microsoft Garage Projects You Didn't Know About
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

In a major reversal, former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, who in 2001 called Linux a "cancer" that attaches itself to the intellectual property of everything it touches, has commended his former company's latest move toward open source.

Earlier this week, when Microsoft announced its SQL Server will run on Linux, Ballmer sent an email to Microsoft's CEO Satya Nadella saying he "loved" the announcement, according to a Reuters report.

Speaking at a dinner Wednesday hosted by Fortune, Ballmer told the attendees that his earlier stance on Linux was right for the time but that now the Linux threat was "in the rearview mirror," according to Reuters.

(Image: EdStock/iStockphoto)

(Image: EdStock/iStockphoto)

The former CEO further noted that Microsoft's earlier hard-line stance to keep Linux away helped it reap far more revenue than it would have, had it embraced the open source community at the time.

However, during Ballmer's tenure as CEO from 2000 to 2013, tech stocks went on a multiyear drop and Microsoft shares lost more than 40% of their value, Reuters noted. Also, shares have risen more than 50% since Nadella took over in February 2014, the news service said.

Times are different now than they were 15 years ago when Ballmer made his Linux cancer statement. The Redmond giant has seen its share of Windows servers losing ground to Linux servers, so it is no longer a case of defending its top position but now rather one of looking to become stronger by aligning with competitors.

[Read RHEL on Azure: What Took So Long?]

In sizing up the change in Microsoft's attitude toward Linux since Nadella came aboard and Ballmer left, Gartner analyst Al Gillen told InformationWeek in a previous interview that the SQL Server Linux arrangement would not have likely happened if Ballmer was still onboard.

"This would not have been possible with Steve Ballmer five years ago," Gillen said, adding that he still doubts it would have been possible with Ballmer today. Gillen believes Ballmer would have stuck to a mentality of keeping Microsoft's server products in a Windows-only mode indefinitely, like keeping the "crown jewels all in a single box."

A possible reason for Ballmer's soften stance: yoga. Reuters reports that since leaving Microsoft, he has taken up yoga as a hobby and spends time meditating.

"You get a lot of time to work out, meditate, take it easy," he told Reuters. "It's a wonderful thing to do."

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/15/2016 | 3:02:52 PM
Ballmer's strategic thinking in doubt
Opposition to Linux was right for the time? It left Microsoft saddled with a legacy of virulent, unreasoning opposition to the open source field, and even today, it has only selectively found partners that it can work with (Samba, Python, Chef, Linux). Microsoft protected Windows revenues, perhaps. But it sacrificed future usage of its Azure cloud, which suffered initially as being viewed as a Microsoft technology showcase. A cloud needs to be open to open source code components and as many potential partners as possible. If you call shooting yourself in the foot a good strategy, then, yes, it was the right move.
jastroff
50%
50%
jastroff,
User Rank: Ninja
3/12/2016 | 3:05:24 PM
Re: Ballmer?
His earlier stance against Linux was wrong for the time.

One would have hoped MSFT could have done something more with open source way back when, but you never know.

Isn't Steve a basketball owner now? What are we still listening to him?
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
3/12/2016 | 1:10:36 PM
Ballmer?
Ballmer is a clueless, opportunistic flip flopper.
Slideshows
How to Land a Job in Cloud Computing
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  6/19/2019
Commentary
How to Convince Wary Customers to Share Personal Information
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  6/17/2019
Commentary
The Art and Science of Robot Wrangling in the AI Era
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  6/11/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
2019 State of DevOps
2019 State of DevOps
DevOps is needed in today's business environment, where improved application security is essential and users demand more applications, services, and features fast. We sought to see where DevOps adoption and deployment stand, this report summarizes our survey findings. Find out what the survey revealed today.
Video
Current Issue
A New World of IT Management in 2019
This IT Trend Report highlights how several years of developments in technology and business strategies have led to a subsequent wave of changes in the role of an IT organization, how CIOs and other IT leaders approach management, in addition to the jobs of many IT professionals up and down the org chart.
Slideshows
Flash Poll