App Consolidation: IT's Cred Is On The Line - InformationWeek
Software // Enterprise Applications
08:06 AM
Connect Directly

App Consolidation: IT's Cred Is On The Line

IT organizations must build credibility as they cut apps, because app sprawl is often due to unmet needs.

Download the entire December 2013 special issue of InformationWeek, distributed in an all-digital format (registration required).

CIOs have tried to streamline their application portfolios for years, holding a particular vengeance against managing multiple systems for email, billing, CRM, business analytics, human resources, and inventory management. There is much to love about application consolidation: It promotes information sharing and interoperability, and it saves money if IT isn't supporting and licensing multiple systems that do the same job. So why is it still so hard?

Forty-five percent of companies manage multiple pieces of software that provide duplicate functionality, according to our InformationWeek Application Consolidation Survey of 169 business technology professionals. Yet only 13% of companies consolidating their app portfolios think the top barrier to doing so is that certain apps offer legitimately unique functionality.

Cloud computing is making things harder. As soon as IT organizations decommission an on-premises application, they're seeing three new cloud-based ones pop up to take its place, since it's so easy for business units and teams to grab an app to get a service they want. Same goes for mobile apps. Unless the top executives are truly committed to application consolidation, it will fail.

Over the past four years at my consulting firm, Fusion PPT, we've seen a lot of our clients tie their application consolidation efforts to their datacenter consolidation. Not so much these days, especially at big companies, however. Why? They think that consolidating applications and datacenters is just too much to tackle at once, and that app consolidation has a big enough benefit that it doesn't need to ride the datacenter's coattails.

But cutting applications stirs strong emotions. One in five respondents to our survey cites "pushback from users" as the No. 1 barrier, tied with lack of budget and limited resources. It's important for IT organizations to understand why their "application huggers" want to hang onto an app and to consider legitimate functional needs versus simple resistance to change. The most effective approach is to seek their input and feedback throughout the process, while emphasizing the executive mandate that some apps must go.

IT organizations must keep something else in mind, as well: 63% of survey respondents say the reason apps got duplicated in the first place was that the existing apps weren't meeting a specific business need. IT must cut applications while showing users that it's trying to satisfy their needs.

Consolidation: Too good to ignore
Cutting costs is the biggest reason companies consolidate applications, cited by 37% of survey respondents. It's easy to make the business case: Just add up the software license costs and the hardware, datacenter space, energy, and other expenses needed to support duplicate apps. Two harder-to-quantify benefits of a smaller app portfolio are that it makes integration and data sharing simpler, and that IT can focus more on the business applications that are core to driving revenue and increasing efficiency.

Identifying overlapping functions is hard when the applications serve different business units, however. The respondents to our survey cite billing and inventory systems as the top candidates for consolidation (selected by 18% and 17% of respondents, respectively). But no other application type (business intelligence, document management, collaboration, ERP, HR) was cited by more than 11% of respondents. And because employees perceive their apps' capabilities as unique, and because they're comfortable with them, even the thought of losing them can be terrifying, making consolidation a political battle that too many CIOs avoid. Just 12% of the IT pros in our survey say employees at their companies accept app consolidation readily, while 57% say they're uneasy and 31% say they're resistant or openly hostile. Talk about a thankless job.

To read the rest of this story,
download the December 2013 special issue of InformationWeek.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Li Tan
Li Tan,
User Rank: Ninja
12/6/2013 | 3:49:47 AM
Re: Cloud vs. on-prem
The biggest problem is not the application itself but the business data. If we start to rent SaaS, how about our business data? For data portability problem, we may leverage the capability of PaaS to store the data in cloud drive. Then the question is, can we fully trust the cloud vendor for data security? Moving to SaaS on cloud is the trend but obviously there is gap here and there to fill.
User Rank: Ninja
12/4/2013 | 1:50:40 PM
Vanilla anyone?
In my opinion, what is driving this is the complete reliance on Off the Shelf applications where customization, at least in-house where it is cheaper, is not an option anymore.

In the old days, pre-Y2K, any company with decent ERP customized the system and wrote their own apps to fill in the gaps of what ERP offered. That's just what you had to do.

Now, ERP companies are holding back their source code and using other strategies where only their people, or their chosen business partners, can customize it. You now see less and less people who even have the skills to do so.

I think jury is out, especially based on observations like in this article, that this vanilla direction is a better way to go. Businesses may think they are better off because they don't pay developers anymore. But now they just send the money to vendors for under-performing systems instead of having the capability to create whatever they need.
Lorna Garey
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
12/4/2013 | 10:10:29 AM
Cloud vs. on-prem
"Cloud computing is making things harder. As soon as IT organizations decommission an on-premises application, they're seeing three new cloud-based ones pop up to take its place"

Is that apples and oranges? Renting an application isn't the same as purchasing, with the attendant licensing and infrastructure costs. Seems like here the bigger problem for CIOs is the difficulty of keeping data portable so they can pull it out of that SaaS system as needed.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Cybersecurity Strategies for the Digital Era
At its core, digital business relies on strong security practices. In addition, leveraging security intelligence and integrating security with operations and developer teams can help organizations push the boundaries of innovation.
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll