BI Platforms: Differences Remain - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Information Management
Commentary
6/15/2010
06:20 AM
Cindi Howson
Cindi Howson
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

BI Platforms: Differences Remain

BI Scorecard has published its latest Product and Vendor Summary. The results show that BI vendors may have narrowed some gaps in product offerings but continue to have profound differences in strategy and detailed capabilities.

BI Scorecard has published its latest Product and Vendor Summary. The results show that BI vendors may have narrowed some gaps in product offerings but continue to have profound differences in strategy and detailed capabilities.

From a strategic perspective, vendors continue to pursue BI from different angles, with some vendors including enterprise information management and performance management capabilities, while others focus more exclusively on core BI. The quality of customer support remains a significant differentiator and yet is one that customers rarely assess even when investing hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual support. In terms of support, Information Builders, MicroStrategy, and SAS earn the highest marks on the Strategic BI Scorecard. Innovation is a strategic consideration, because BI and the way people approach it is continually evolving. Customers want to know when a vendor will support new technologies such as the iPad, in-memory or social networking, for example. For innovation, SAP BusinessObjects, Information Builders, and QlikTech earn the highest marks of the nine vendors covered in depth. However, as you've read in my cool-BI blogs, the biggest mistake customers make is in overlooking niche vendors to supplement their BI platform standards. While large vendors are innovating, niche vendors fill gaps in certain capabilities and/or embrace emerging trends more fully.However, much of the BI buying is influenced more by product capabilities. While vendors have continued to expand their BI offerings to encompass a full spectrum ranging from business query to OLAP to dashboards and predictive analytics, the robustness of these capabilities differs dramatically from product to product. No single vendor receives an "excellent" across the full spectrum of BI modules so customers must continue to prioritize requirements and understand these differences. Dashboards have increased in importance, and yet, the best dashboard capabilities come from specialty products, such as QlikTech QlikView. Of the 4 mega BI vendors, Oracle offers the better dashboard capabilities that are both interactive and tightly integrated with the BI platform. Other noteworthy scores in the BI Scorecard Product Summary include:

  • MicroStrategy receives the highest product marks overall, showing that the vendor's decision for "depth versus breadth" in BI is evidenced in the product maturity.
  • SAS receives the highest rating of all vendors evaluated for its Add-In for Microsoft Office.
  • SAP BusinessObjects receives the highest rating for business query and information delivery categories, the two most-important-rated categories by business users.
  • Microsoft and IBM Cognos receive the highest ratings for their OLAP capabilities. Microsoft's addition of in-memory capabilities of PowerPivot enhances what was already one of the best OLAP offerings on the market with SQL Server Analysis Services. IBM Cognos has enhanced its OLAP capabilities by supporting TM1 on its 8.4 platform and including it as part of the Cognos Express product.
Trends and highlights from the report are available for free here, or customers can purchase the individual report.

Regards, Cindi Howson, BI ScorecardBI Scorecard has published its latest Product and Vendor Summary. The results show that BI vendors may have narrowed some gaps in product offerings but continue to have profound differences in strategy and detailed capabilities.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Commentary
Why It's Nice to Know What Can Go Wrong with AI
James M. Connolly, Editorial Director, InformationWeek and Network Computing,  11/11/2019
Slideshows
Top-Paying U.S. Cities for Data Scientists and Data Analysts
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  11/5/2019
Slideshows
10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2020
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  11/1/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Getting Started With Emerging Technologies
Looking to help your enterprise IT team ease the stress of putting new/emerging technologies such as AI, machine learning and IoT to work for their organizations? There are a few ways to get off on the right foot. In this report we share some expert advice on how to approach some of these seemingly daunting tech challenges.
Slideshows
Flash Poll