It's Not Just Semantics - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Information Management

It's Not Just Semantics

The Worldwide Web Consortium's Eric Miller says the Semantic Web is the enterprise's best hope for sustainable data interoperability.

How can Semantic Web technology benefit businesses when even centrally controlled data has quality, integration and metadata problems?

Semantic Web technologies are primarily a powerful means for supporting data integration and reducing the costs of data reuse, freeing the information from the applications that create it. As a side benefit, these technologies can allow more people to work on quality and maintenance, continuously and collectively — in turn reducing the costs of quality while improving it.

How do Semantic Web technologies enable that?

The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is the underlying unified data model for representing semantics. The RDF model is similar to an entity-relationship (E-R) model: resources (entities) have relationships with other resources on the Web. One important difference between RDF and E-R is that RDF lets you define relationships in the context of other relationships. For example, if there's a "title" term in one database and "document title" in another, I can add a new assertion to the Web that says they mean the same thing. So when people search for one, they can easily search on the other at the same time. An XML representation of this assertion can be written to the Web so others can exploit it.

RDF at the very basic level defines a simple, powerful, flexible data model. RDF Schema builds on this model, enabling individuals or communities to declare descriptive terms such as "cost" along with classes of objects such as "person" or "car" for any particular domain or application.

Do people need to organize and manage the terms they use?

OWL, the World Wide Web Consortium's Web Ontology Language, provides a descriptive means of relating and constraining terms. For example, "automobile" is the same as "car," "author" is a relationship that exists only between a "person" and a "document," and a "person" can be male or female but not both, and so on.

RDF, RDF Schema and OWL are also designed to provide incrementally more powerful inferencing capabilities — recognizing implied relationships that exist among data and making these explicit for others to use.

The cumulative effect — the network effect — of all these assertions (machine inferenced or provided by people) being recorded back into the Web is powerful. Each new assertion adds value to the Web for everyone.

Isn't there a danger incorrect assertions will make the Web unreliable for business?

This is a good point, and it gets back to the issue of governance. There's a strong benefit in leveraging these open solutions in a closed environment. Inside an organization, instead of just anyone being able to make these relationship assertions, there could be a "semantic integration" department responsible for them.

But the pattern I'm seeing right now is that businesses are combining the two approaches: distributed and centralized. Anyone inside the company can begin to stitch data together by adding assertions back into the network. The centralized group in charge of the mappings is facilitated by the fact that all these people are tying these things together. Meanwhile, the centralized group runs off-the-shelf bots that harvest these assertions from the intranet and evaluate their accuracy.

Book recommendation: The Professor and the Madman: A Tale of Murder, Insanity, and the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary by Simon Winchester.

What's great about jazz: The best artists make a bit of order out of chaos.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Becoming a Self-Taught Cybersecurity Pro
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  6/9/2021
News
Ancestry's DevOps Strategy to Control Its CI/CD Pipeline
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  6/4/2021
Slideshows
IT Leadership: 10 Ways to Unleash Enterprise Innovation
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/8/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Slideshows
Flash Poll