Citing security concerns, the U.S. Marine Corps banned Twitter, MySpace, Facebook and other social networking sites from its networks, effective immediately, for a year. And other branches of the military are considering doing the same.
Citing security concerns, the U.S. Marine Corps banned Twitter, MySpace, Facebook and other social networking sites from its networks, effective immediately, for a year. And other branches of the military are considering doing the same.Wired's Danger Room blog has been following for the past few days the story of how Pentagon officials are pushing back on widespread adoption of social media within the military.
"These internet sites in general are a proven haven for malicious actors and content and are particularly high risk due to information exposure, user generated content and targeting by adversaries," reads a Marine Corps order, issued Monday. "The very nature of SNS [social network sites] creates a larger attack and exploitation window, exposes unnecessary information to adversaries and provides an easy conduit for information leakage that puts OPSEC [operational security], COMSEC [communications security], [and] personnel… at an elevated risk of compromise."...
Social networks present a tough quandry for the military. On the one hand, they're a powerful tool for building support for the war at home, and keeping morale up.
One active-duty U.S. Army Major hopes the ban doesn't pan out."The American people deserve to know what their wonderful sons and daughters are doing overseas, in harms way. It is our job to tell that to you as military professionals," he blogs. "I truly hope that logic prevails in this situation."
The Pentagon recently hired a social media czar to encourage use of the tools in the military; he's pushing back against the ban. Defense Secretary Robert Gates recently expressed concern that America is losing the social media war.
On the other hand, the security concerns are staggering. Danger Room cites the threat of viruses and phishing scams spread over social media networks. And soldiers can give out information that the enemy can use to compromise Americans' security-sometimes unwittingly, as when Congressman and Navy reservist Mark Kirk tweeted that he was "on duty @ the Pentagon's National Military Command Center," or Congressman Pete Hoekstra Twittered about a fact-finding trip to Iraq.
I'm encouraged to see this issue being decided with intelligent arguments on both sides. Too often, when openness and security are at odds to each other, extremists on both sides take over the discussion, which becomes an argument between pie-eyed hippies who think a hug is a solution to every problem versus paranoids who have seen way too many Dirty Harry movies. In reality, hugs are great, but there are, unfortunately, a lot of murderous thugs out there, and reasonable people need to find strategies to navigate between the two.
InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on leading-edge government IT -- and how the technology involved may end up inside your business. Download the report here (registration required).
Follow InformationWeek on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn:
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security EnterpriseTo learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
2017 State of IT ReportIn today's technology-driven world, "innovation" has become a basic expectation. IT leaders are tasked with making technical magic, improving customer experience, and boosting the bottom line -- yet often without any increase to the IT budget. How are organizations striking the balance between new initiatives and cost control? Download our report to learn about the biggest challenges and how savvy IT executives are overcoming them.