NoSQL Databases: An Enterprise Necessity - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Information Management
News
9/5/2016
10:06 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
0%
100%

NoSQL Databases: An Enterprise Necessity

Here's a look at enterprise plans for implementation of NoSQL databases, and some of the top vendors providing this technology.

9 iOS, Android Apps To Creatively Boost Productivity
9 iOS, Android Apps To Creatively Boost Productivity
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Relational databases have long been a staple in enterprise IT. But demand for different kinds of databases has grown in recent years. And, according to a new Forrester Wave report, "NoSQL is not an option -- it has become a necessity to support next-generation applications."

What's so great about NoSQL? The non-relational technology can support scale-out architecture which leverages low-cost compute servers, clustered to deliver performance of large high-end symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) servers, Forrester Research said. Plus, NoSQL offers a flexible schema-less model providing the capability to store, process, and access any type of customer or business data. It can support structured, unstructured, and semi-structured data.

And NoSQL can lower data management costs, because many NoSQL solutions are open source, and others sell for much less than a full version of commercial relational database management solutions.

[ Even the best intentions can go horribly wrong. Read 10 Ways To Doom Your Next Mobile App. ]

Forrester looked at several NoSQL options in its recent Forrester Wave report, including open source, cloud-based, and commercial, and included 15 NoSQL solutions in its report. Forrester considered nine of those to be leaders in its 26-criteria evaluation.

As part of its vendor evaluation, Forrester fielded an online survey in March 2016 that included 3,343 respondents from the following countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, New Zealand, the UK and the US. All the respondents were people who have significant involvement in planning, funding, and purchasing business and technology products and services. And they all worked at companies with 100 or more employees.

A full version of the report is available from a few of the vendors who ranked as Leaders, including MongoDB which topped the list, as well as MapR and Couchbase.

The full report features more detailed analysis of each NoSQL provider's strengths and weaknesses.

Here, we pulled out a quick snapshot view of NoSQL's momentum in the enterprise, plus the list of the nine vendors that Forrester ranked as Leaders. 

(Home Page Image: bakhtiar_zein/iStockphoto)

Jessica Davis has spent a career covering the intersection of business and technology at titles including IDG's Infoworld, Ziff Davis Enterprise's eWeek and Channel Insider, and Penton Technology's MSPmentor. She's passionate about the practical use of business intelligence, ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
rob777
50%
50%
rob777,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/19/2016 | 6:57:13 AM
Analysts are over-weighting mindshare
The major analysts evaluating the NoSQL space are over-weighting mindshare -- the public and social media buzz about these products. This misweighting makes open-source products look like "leaders" when in fact many of them are not enterprise-ready and cannot be used reliably for enterprise deployment. 
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
9/17/2016 | 6:24:12 AM
NoSQL means no SQL
Many NoSQL database engines do not support SQL. Rather obvious given the name, but a signifcant issue because now we have to deal with query languages such as LINQ or other constructs. This requires addional skills and a total rethink on how data is approached. I do not think that is necessarily bad, but it will not help to move structured, relational data to NoSQL and otherwise do not change anything.
sidwayne
50%
50%
sidwayne,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/6/2016 | 10:12:55 AM
No Cassandra?
I am amazed Cassandra is not in the list. 
Slideshows
Strategies You Need to Make Digital Transformation Work
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  11/25/2019
Commentary
Enterprise Guide to Data Privacy
Cathleen Gagne, Managing Editor, InformationWeek,  11/22/2019
News
Watch Out: 7 Digital Disruptions for IT Leaders
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  11/18/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Getting Started With Emerging Technologies
Looking to help your enterprise IT team ease the stress of putting new/emerging technologies such as AI, machine learning and IoT to work for their organizations? There are a few ways to get off on the right foot. In this report we share some expert advice on how to approach some of these seemingly daunting tech challenges.
Slideshows
Flash Poll