Server products and services: Windows Server, Visual Studio, Microsoft SQL Server, System Center, Microsoft Azure
Enterprise services: Microsoft Consulting and Premier Support services
More Personal Computing
Windows: Windows OEM licensing, other non-volume licensing of Windows OS, volume licensing of Windows OS, patent licensing, Windows Embedded, MSN display advertising, Windows Phone licensing
Devices: Surface, Windows Phone, PC accessories
Gaming: Xbox gaming consoles, Xbox Live, first-party video games, second- and third-party video game royalties
Microsoft will begin to announce financial results according to this structure on Oct. 22, 2015, when it holds the quarterly earnings call for Q1 2016.
If these three divisions sound familiar, it's because we've been hearing about them since CEO Satya Nadella highlighted a new mission statement and "three interconnected and bold ambitions" to drive success in a mobile-first, cloud-first world.
His plans for Microsoft: Reinvent productivity and business processes, build the intelligent cloud platform, and create more personal computing. "Our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more," he wrote in an email obtained by Geekwire.
The last time Microsoft shifted its financial reporting structure was in the aftermath of a massive reorganization in July 2013. Results were divided into two larger subgroups to separate Commercial products and services from Devices & Consumer (D&C). Five categories of D&C were D&C Licensing, D&C Hardware, D&C Other, Commercial Licensing, and Commercial Other.
"By moving to these three segments, we are providing transparency in our progress against our ambitions," said Microsoft officials in a conference call Sept. 29. The new reporting strategy will reportedly provide greater insight into how the company is meeting its core priorities.
But will it?
While the new reporting strategy will more clearly highlight how Microsoft is achieving its core ambitions, it will also muddle the waters when it comes to determining the success or failure of each individual product and service. Combining Windows, Surface, and phones in the same category, for example, can ultimately conceal how Microsoft's hardware is performing in relation to Windows.
Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
2018 State of the CloudCloud adoption is growing, but how are organizations taking advantage of it? Interop ITX and InformationWeek surveyed technology decision-makers to find out, read this report to discover what they had to say!