Standards: Too Many Acronyms, Too Little Cooperation - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Hardware & Infrastructure
04:07 PM

Standards: Too Many Acronyms, Too Little Cooperation

Businesses need interoperability to automate more functions, but that requires standards that are still very much in flux.

"The trouble with standards is there are too many of them," says Tim Grieser, an analyst with market-research firm IDC.

There's a feeling among many in the tech industry that breakthrough data-center automation won't be realized until IT management systems and processes can interoperate across vendors and platforms much better than they do today. That, however, will take solid standards, which can happen only if vendors cooperate. "The user doesn't care how it's done," Grieser says. "What they want is the proper service level."

A variety of industry organizations--the Distributed Management Task Force, the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, and the Open Grid Services Architecture--are trying to develop standards for communication and implementation of automated IT operations.

In May, the Data Center Markup Language organization published a framework specification intended to improve interoperability among various components by establishing a way to describe the data-center environment, the relationships between the components, and policies governing management. The XML-based framework defines a conceptual data model in which elements of the data center can be described, with process rules for interpretation, including the grammar and structure to build networks, servers, applications, and services.

The effort is being led by Computer Associates, EDS, Opsware, and Tibco Software. Proponents believe using it can improve data-center operations in the same way the TCP/IP and HTML standards helped enable the Internet community.

"We're not manufacturing widgets, we're manufacturing services," says Louis Blatt, senior VP of product management and strategy at CA and DCML president. "As we create those services, we need to map them to the IT resources that support them so if there are defects in performance, you can isolate the root cause and quickly correct the problem."

But Jeff Smith, VP of demand automation for IBM Tivoli, calls the DCML spec "a proprietary approach that fundamentally is Opsware's." He notes that major hardware vendors, including Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Sun Microsystems--as well as Microsoft--aren't part of the DCML effort. "We're working with the DMTF to create a real standard that will remain closely related to" the Information Technology Infrastructure Library, a framework for defining the business process.

Blatt says DCML has submitted its specification to a number of standards bodies. DMTF and Oasis have shown interest in taking over the process, and both organizations count HP, IBM, and Sun as members, he says. "We launched the process to force the participation of the larger vendors and make them understand the criticality of a unifying platform," Blatt says. "We are well on our way to forcing the inclusion of the major hardware vendors into this vision."

There are similar efforts on the information-security front, since patch-management systems, firewalls, vulnerability scanning, and intrusion-detection systems generally don't communicate well.

To help simplify and integrate security functions, security vendors are developing standards such as the Application Vulnerability Definition Language. With AVDL, for example, when a new software vulnerability surfaces, a company's vulnerability scanner could spot the flaw. The scanner would send information to firewalls and patch-management systems, whose applications would use that data to adjust to better protect against attacks.

Return to main story, Automating The IT Factory

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

IT Leadership: 10 Ways to Unleash Enterprise Innovation
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/8/2021
Preparing for the Upcoming Quantum Computing Revolution
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  6/3/2021
How SolarWinds Changed Cybersecurity Leadership's Priorities
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  5/26/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll