GM's Randy Mott: What I Believe... - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IT Leadership // CIO Insights & Innovation
09:17 AM
Rob Preston
Rob Preston
Connect Directly

GM's Randy Mott: What I Believe...

CIO's five core principles underpin automaker's three-year "IT transformation" plan.

During Randy Mott's 30-plus years in IT, he has developed some core beliefs. Rely on in-house people rather than outsourcers. Get data to the right people to help them make more-informed decisions. Deliver projects faster than before. Streamline and automate IT operations to free up more money for innovative work.

Now Mott is applying that belief system to General Motors under a three-year "IT transformation" plan, during one of the most tumultuous times in the company's 106-year history. He joined GM as CIO in February 2012, when the automaker was emerging from a controversial government bailout and takeover, and now much of the public's attention is turning to GM's handling of a defective ignition switch on earlier-model Chevy Cobalts and other models that is linked to driver deaths.

Against that backdrop, Mott and team are a little over a year into the IT overhaul plan, one of whose goals is to improve data sharing and analysis to help GM identify engineering and manufacturing problems earlier in the process. Underpinning that broad plan are Mott's five core principles -- as he has expressed them in recent presentations under the heading "What I believe..." -- which I lay out below, adding a bit of my own analysis on how they relate to the modern world.

1. Real innovation happens with IT professionals tightly aligned to company strategy.
We've all been hearing this refrain for decades. In fact, IT-business "alignment" is almost always the No. 1 challenge cited by respondents to the annual Society for Information Management survey. You'd think such alignment would have happened by now.

Sure, CIOs and other IT leaders must be on the same page with every business unit, whether it's sales, marketing, finance, HR, or manufacturing. But IT-business alignment isn't a one-way street. Mott talked about a refined senior executive structure at GM that -- not necessarily by design -- is starting to align the company's business leaders with Mott's IT goals, one of which is to eliminate the sprawl of applications and data while moving to global software platforms. For instance, there's now a single head of global manufacturing (Timothy E. Lee) as Mott looks to standardize GM units on global manufacturing systems. There's now a single head of global quality and customer experience (Alicia Boler-Davis) as Mott looks to consolidate GM's quality, customer, and other data into a single global data warehouse.

Learn more about how analytics and data management are core to GM's IT transformation. See GM's Data Strategy Pushed To Center Stage.]

So it's not just about IT aligning with the business. "The business has moved toward us," he told InformationWeek in a recent interview at GM's Detroit headquarters.

2. Real business applications on an enterprise scale DO NOT come from venture capitalists.
The all caps emphasis is Mott's, not mine. This may be the most contentious point in Mott's belief system. It's trendy these days for companies in a range of industries (Capital One, GE, Ford, Wal-Mart) to set up a digital innovation shop/lab/center in Silicon Valley, and for their CIOs/chief digital officers to meet with venture capitalists and startups to tap into the latest thinking. But when Mott was identifying locations last year for four technical innovation centers GM wanted to set up across the country, he stayed away from the Valley and other VC hotbeds. Instead, he opted for suburban Detroit, Atlanta, Phoenix, and Austin, mainly for their proximity to current GM operations and/or affordable tech talent, including a dozen or so universities.

Mott isn't arguing that VC-backed startups produce no meaningful enterprise IT innovations. But he's skeptical that their systems and applications can scale, affordably, to meet Fortune 100 needs.

As Mott's team started last year to pull billions of dollars of IT operations and development in-house from four or five outsourcers, the automaker signed long-term (five-year) enterprise license agreements with 11 blue chip vendors: Adobe, CA, Cisco, EMC, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, McAfee, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, and VMware. Mott values not only the proven scalability of those vendors' products, but also their global footprint and product line breadth.

He also values systems and applications that can be customized and integrated with others, one reason he's not a big fan of cloud services. Embracing cloud software and infrastructure is "a strategy of how do I get even, not how do I get ahead," Mott says. "And I think the companies that win in their industries are the ones that figure out how to get ahead, because getting competitive advantage takes innovation, it takes creativity, and you're not going to get that from someone who's going to make everyone on the planet even."

3. Modern, innovative companies have a good mix of experienced IT professionals and college hires who are forward-thinking and less resistant to change.
As GM moves from doing 10% of its IT work in-house as of January 2013 to doing 90% of it in-house by the end of 2015, it's hiring thousands of people while taking billions of dollars of work back from outsourcers.

As part of that effort, GM's IT organization will have brought on 4,500 new people by the end of this year, 600 of them recent college grads. Long term, by about 2018, GM will have about 12,000 IT employees, Mott estimates.

Mott and team are hiring for a mix of skills, including SAP, Siebel, and even PeopleSoft development and integration; Java and .Net development, especially for sales, marketing, and dealer apps; and Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server databases. The overall focus: Do much less "run the business" IT work, whether by staffers or the outsourcers that remain, and more new

Next Page

Rob Preston currently serves as VP and editor in chief of InformationWeek, where he oversees the editorial content and direction of its various website, digital magazine, Webcast, live and virtual event, and other products. Rob has 25 years of experience in high-tech ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
1 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Author
3/31/2014 | 9:47:25 AM
Re: Mott misconstrues cloud services
His cloud skepticism definitely bucks the trend, Charlie. I can't think of any CIO I've spoken with that is as skeptical about the value to be had from cloud software. I'm looking forward to the on stage discussion with InformationWeek Conference attendees this week, to hear what kind of questions CIO peers ask.
Charlie Babcock
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/27/2014 | 5:44:17 PM
Mott misconstrues cloud services
When Mott says using cloud infrastructure and software as a service is a way to get even, not get ahead, he misconceives of what's going on out there. I agree it is a good idea to keep core IT skills in house, but they can be put to work effectively on cloud infrastructure and customizing SaaS, if that's what the CIO wants. He's thinking too much in-house resources are better than external ones. You don't have to be an advocate of outsourcing to make good use of the cloud. On the contrary, the cloud gives the internal managers control over the resource and allows them to use it as an extension of the data center. To misconceive this could be damaging to your long term prospects.
Lorna Garey
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
3/27/2014 | 1:32:24 PM
Re: Will the trend toward inhouse IT stick at GM?
At the size companies Mott leads, doing IT in-house seems to make perfect sense -- the scale is at least equal to what most outsourcers offer. For smaller companes the numbers are likely not as clear. 
User Rank: Author
3/27/2014 | 11:49:34 AM
Re: Will the trend toward inhouse IT stick at GM?
This will stick. Randy Mott didn't believe in outsourcing when he was at Wal-Mart, Dell, or HP either, and he stuck to that philosophy. It's a core principle of his, going back 30 years, not a trendy move. From what I understand, GM's leadership is on board. Mott thinks insourcing not only will produce more IT innovation, but it will also cost a bit less. As Mott says, IT outsourcing vendors charge for "resource + margin," so there's no incentive for them to reduce resources applied to any given project or responsibility.
David F. Carr
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
3/27/2014 | 10:46:59 AM
Will the trend toward inhouse IT stick at GM?
Do you think the direction toward bringing more IT inhouse will stick at GM, or will we see the strategy seesaw back to an emphasis on outsourcing? Many organizations identified outsourcing (and skill at doing it well) as a strategic imperative over the past couple of decades. Were they 100% wrong?
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Becoming a Self-Taught Cybersecurity Pro
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  6/9/2021
Ancestry's DevOps Strategy to Control Its CI/CD Pipeline
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  6/4/2021
IT Leadership: 10 Ways to Unleash Enterprise Innovation
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/8/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Flash Poll