Software Licensing: Move From Defense To Offense - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
IT Leadership // IT Strategy
News
9/2/2014
09:06 AM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Software Licensing: Move From Defense To Offense

Avoiding audits and vendor fines isn't enough. Take control of licensing to exact deeper software discounts and match purchasing to actual employee needs.

specific users hasn't been used in the last 60 or 90 days (or whatever threshold a company chooses), it can uninstall that software and eliminate that license or reallocate it to another user.

Hearst is in the early stages of its optimization efforts, but Bennett says it already has reallocated more than 1,000 Adobe and Microsoft licenses that weren't being used. Let's say that's a corporate-discounted license for Adobe Acrobat or Microsoft Office that might have otherwise set Hearst back $75 to $125 a seat. That's $75,000 to $125,000 in savings on those titles alone.

Bring On Complexity
Software optimization doesn't always involve a binary, buy-another-license-or-not scenario. For sophisticated enterprise applications such as business intelligence, CRM, and ERP, usage analysis might reveal that specific employees can be downgraded to less-expensive licenses. In simple cases, that choice might be "read-only," "contributor," or "power user" licenses. SAP, for one, has more than 60 different user categories across its Business Suite licensing schemes.

Server-based licensing schemes and virtualization, as well as private and public cloud schemes, have introduced yet more complexity (see related story, "Cloud Won't Cure Licensing Woes"). The majority (55%) of the respondents to our survey say they prefer flat-rate site licenses, but they often have to deal with per-user, per-CPU, per-core, or even per-VM licensing approaches. IBM came up with its PVU metric in response to virtualization -- meaning it charges based on how many processors the software runs on, not on how many chips (which might hold multiple processors) or servers. Licensing levels can quickly change depending on variables that aren't fully captured in the IBM License Metric Tool, says Christof Beaupoil, co-founder and president of Aspera Technologies.

IBM's DB2 database, for example, might be free when provided as part of another product, but IBM will likely charge for it if it's used with anything other than the product with which it was bundled. "If an audit reveals that a third-party product is connected to the database, guess what: It has to be licensed," Beaupoil says.

It's often the case that software is initially installed and used in accordance with licenses, but access and usage patterns evolve over time, getting out of sync with the original terms and usage entitlements. "Every time you have a change in how software is being used, the software vendors realign how they license their software, so customers have to reassess how they capture and count licenses," Beaupoil says.

With client computing, for example, we've gone from having desktops to having desktops, notebooks, tablets, and smartphones, as well as virtual desktops. Employees access software in the cloud, and they're allowed to bring their own devices to work. On the server side, licensing has evolved from mainframes to servers to multi-CPU and multi-core servers to today's virtualized and private cloud deployments.

Evolve Your Approach
Software management and optimization tools give companies comprehensive information on installs and usage that they can compare to licenses, but software alone won't solve the license management problem. Business leaders, IT teams, and purchasing departments must team up to ensure that their good intentions don't backfire. Purchasing departments, for example, are known to strike special deals that can't possibly be enforced by IT. "We're seeing more usage-based licensing, with pay-per-use or concurrent-user approaches," says IDC's Konary, "but IT could tell them that there are typically no tools available to track and meter usage and ensure that they're not exceeding that limit."

Another licensing gotcha is what Konary calls the "honor system" approach, which makes it all too easy for administrators to install and turn on features not covered by a current license. Software vendors defend this approach, arguing that it makes it easy for customers to obtain software and try new features. But it also creates the distinct possibility of using features that haven't been paid for. And audits uncover those discrepancies. When that happens, true-up fees might apply whereby companies lose discounts and face full list prices applied retroactively.

Oracle is the leading practitioner of the honor system approach. Most software vendors have switched to what Konary calls a "trust-but-verify" approach, whereby customers who download software or try to turn on optional features will get pop-up messages that say something like, "You don't have access to this feature. Call your sales representative and we'll turn it on for you."

License management teams should create policies and education programs around key software titles known for tricky licensing and frequent compliance problems. "Oracle Database, as an example, is not friendly within virtualized environments," Konary says. "A simple rule might be, 'Oracle Database does not go into virtualized environments, and if it does, here are the steps that must be followed.'"

Microsoft Office is another source of frequent compliance problems because it's difficult to track decentralized desktop software and reconcile usage with complex licensing terms. All the more reason for clear processes and policies around buying software, choosing licensing levels, installing and handling upgrades, and transferring licenses that aren't in use.

First Things First
Audits are bad enough, but when companies aren't prepared for them or they don't go well, they can turn into time- and energy-sapping disputes. Seventeen percent of our survey respondents said their organizations have had at least one contract or usage-rights dispute with a vendor over the past two years. To avoid this scenario, start your software compliance and optimization efforts with the titles that represent most of your spend and your biggest audit risk.

The five vendors most likely to audit corporate software licenses are Microsoft, Adobe, Autodesk, Oracle, and SAP, in that order, according to a 2013 survey by Express Metrix. Among customer organizations with 10,000 or more employees, IBM jumped to the No. 4 spot, bumping the others down one spot. Rounding out the survey's seventh to 10th most-frequent auditors are McAfee, Attachmate, VMware, and Symantec.

Don't be content to just make sure licenses are in line with installations. Do a discount double check to try to lower your bill. Eighty-eight percent of the respondents to our survey say they have negotiated discounts of more than 5%; nearly half (47%) say they've negotiated discounts of 11% to 20%. With centralized knowledge of all purchasing (even if decentralized units still do some of the buying), you'll be able to take advantage of every discount available.

With that victory, push to the next level of sophistication by acquiring a deeper understanding of how employees use software so that you can optimize purchasing. Maybe you're buying expensive power-user licenses for casual users, or maybe those casual users aren't really using the software at all. With knowledge of usage and entitlements, you'll be able to choose the right license levels for each user. And like Bennett of Hearst, maybe you'll be able to reallocate unused licenses and save tens of thousands -- if not hundreds of thousands -- of dollars by avoiding unnecessary purchases. You still won't be thrilled when the software auditor knocks on your door. But you'll be ready.

Related stories:

5 Signs You'll Face A Software Audit

Cloud Won't Cure Licensing Woes

Get the entire Sept. 2 issue of InformationWeek - no registration required.

 

Doug Henschen is Executive Editor of InformationWeek, where he covers the intersection of enterprise applications with information management, business intelligence, big data and analytics. He previously served as editor in chief of Intelligent Enterprise, editor in chief of ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Previous
3 of 3
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
9/4/2014 | 9:00:57 PM
Re: Software Licensing
Thanks for your comments. I did mention that the audit-in-the-last-two-years figure is even higher, 40%, for companies with more than 500 employees. I've seen studies from Flexera and Express Metrix with even higher figures for larger companies, but we didn't break out a higher split in our study.
zerox203
100%
0%
zerox203,
User Rank: Ninja
9/4/2014 | 8:14:48 PM
Re: Software Licensing
What a long-overdue topic for a second look at many organizations. It's refreshing to see an an article so comprehensive on a topic that's so oft-overlooked, especially in a world of quick blogs, vague blurbs, and buzzword-laden tweets. Instead, these points are made here with plenty of numbers to back them up, insights from real people in the industry, and, most importantly, specific tips and best practices for how to do it better at your organization.You can't blame people for wanting to ignore licensing for as long as they can - it's complicated and, frankly, boring. This article makes a great case for not only why you should worry about it, but how to do so without losing sleep.

The numbers themselves do offer a bit of a mixed picture though, don't they? 1/3rd of organizations were audited in the last two years - and that doesn't say anything for the size or industry of those companies, or how those audits turned out. That still makes it sound like an okay bet to stick your head in the sand and pretend like you're not going to be audited. The cost savings and license management benefits are the real kickers to me. There are headaches other than just audits to worry about  when it comes to licensing - and how great if you can get one service that takes care of all of them!
D. Henschen
100%
0%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
9/3/2014 | 8:32:42 AM
Aspera is an independent company, not affiliated with IBM
Thanks for catching that stray "IBM." Beaupoil's quote addressed a prominent IBM licensing product, but his company, Aspera, is not affiliated with IBM. The reference was corrected accordingly.
Franc3141
100%
0%
Franc3141,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/3/2014 | 8:13:34 AM
Great summary of SAM/SLO challenges
You say all in 3 pages! This war is not going to stop. Great post.

Remark: I guess it is not true to say "Christof Beaupoil, co-founder and president of IBM's Aspera Technologies", Aspera is not linked to IBM at all. There a couple of organizations named Aspera, the one involved in SAM space is not belonging to IBM.
Charlie Babcock
0%
100%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
9/2/2014 | 4:53:27 PM
How big are those vendor audit staffs?
Yes, the best defense is a good offense, especially for the mid-sized companies that don't have large IT staffs. I am surprised that 37% of companies surveyed have been audited in the last 24 months. The software vendors are investing heavily in auditing customers.
Mark532010
100%
0%
Mark532010,
User Rank: Moderator
9/2/2014 | 11:36:43 AM
great post
Great post. I can't stress enough the hidden benefits of finding spare software. Talk about getting kudos, when you can circulate an email that says "hey, we have 15 spare unused copies of Photoshop, anyone have a use for them?"

 

p.s. Microsofts SCCM is not free as is implied. In fact the licensing for it is very complex with client and server licensing and has an entire pdf devoted to trying to figure out how much it will cost you.
D. Henschen
100%
0%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
9/2/2014 | 10:25:55 AM
Best defense is a good offense...
Midsize and larger companies deal with hundreds of software titles, and between different locations and business units, there's no way you can keep track of it all with spreadsheets and paper files. License-management and sofware-license-optimization software can help, but you'll also need policies and procedures to ensure that you're licensing only the sofware that you need and that you're getting every discount you deserve.
Li Tan
100%
0%
Li Tan,
User Rank: Ninja
9/2/2014 | 9:56:31 AM
Proper software licensing is your responsibility
I cannot agree more with the points raised in this post. As IT manager, you cannot simply be reactive for software licensing to fulfil audit requirements. You need to take full responsbility for proper software licensing. It means to become on top of the issue and fully understand/manage the proper licensing fulfilling your enterprise needs.
News
How to Create a Successful AI Program
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  10/14/2020
News
Think Like a Chief Innovation Officer and Get Work Done
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  10/13/2020
Slideshows
10 Trends Accelerating Edge Computing
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  10/8/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
[Special Report] Edge Computing: An IT Platform for the New Enterprise
Edge computing is poised to make a major splash within the next generation of corporate IT architectures. Here's what you need to know!
Slideshows
Flash Poll