Supreme Court Sends Microsoft Case To Appeals Court - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
News

Supreme Court Sends Microsoft Case To Appeals Court

Microsoft won the latest battle in its antitrust case today as the U.S. Supreme Court said the company's appeal of a break-up order should first be heard in a lower court. The decision sets the stage for hearings in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., a venue regarded as more sympathetic to Microsoft.

Eight of the Supreme Court's nine justices voted to send Microsoft's appeal to the lower court, rather than hear the case immediately, as the Justice Department and 19 states suing Microsoft for antitrust violations had wanted. Only Justice Stephen Breyer dissented, saying the case "affects an important sector of the economy--a sector characterized by rapid technological change. Speed may help create a legal certainty."

In June, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ordered Microsoft broken into two companies for stifling competition through antitrust violations. But the judge stayed the break-up order--and remedies imposed on Microsoft--until the company exhausts its appeals. The Justice Department wanted the appeal forwarded directly to the Supreme Court, citing a 1974 law that permits expediting antitrust cases in the national interest. But the high court declined to review the case on a fast track, sending it to the appeals court, which overruled Jackson once before in the Microsoft case, in 1998. The decision sent Microsoft stock up $2.94 early this afternoon, to $64.19.

In a TV appearance after the decision was announced, Microsoft president and CEO Steve Ballmer said the company is "glad to have a chance to present [our position] to the appellate court." The high court's action is "just another procedural step in the process."

A Justice Department spokeswoman says, "We look forward to presenting our case to the court of appeals as expeditiously as possible."

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll