The European Union Vs. Microsoft: A Timeline Of Events - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

10:49 AM

The European Union Vs. Microsoft: A Timeline Of Events

The European Union this week fined Microsoft $357 million. How'd they get to that point?

November 1998:The EU's antitrust agency looks into a complaint from Sun Microsystems that claims Microsoft had failed to provide information needed by the Solaris operating system to interoperate with PCs running Windows.

August 2000: European Commission formally charges that Microsoft withheld technical information from rivals so it could dominate the server software market.

August 2001: Commission levels second charge at Microsoft -- that it violates antitrust laws by tying its Windows Media Player with the OS in an attempt to freeze out RealNetworks' RealPlayer -- and merges it with the server accusation of the year before.

January 2003: EU receives complaints from Microsoft competitors that Windows XP is designed to extend Microsoft's desktop monopoly into instant messaging and mobile phones.

August 2003: EU gives Microsoft "one last opportunity to comment" before it wraps up its antitrust probe.

March 18, 2004: Direct negotiations between Microsoft's chief executive Steve Ballmer and EU Commissioner Mario Monti break down.

March 24, 2004: EU fines Microsoft 497 euros ($613 million), and orders the developer to release a version of Windows XP without Media Player. Also demands Microsoft release protocols to rival server software makers.

June 2004:Microsoft appeals Commission fine and orders with the European Unions Court of First Instance.

December 2004: Court of First Instance rejects Microsoft's request for a suspension of the Commission's orders while the case is on appeal. Microsoft begins the process of licensing communication protocols to rivals.

June 2005: Microsoft announces Windows XP Home Edition N and Windows XP Professional Edition N -- both sans Windows Media Player -- to meet 2004 order's demands.

December 2005: European Commission accuses Microsoft of dragging its feet in providing protocol documentation to other server software makers, files formal objection and threatens 2 million euro per day ($2.37 million at the time) fine. Penalty will be backdated to December 15, 2005.

January 25, 2006: In an attempt to placate the Commission, Microsoft announces it will license source code for Windows Server to rivals. Company's general counsel, Brad Smith, says "The Windows source code is the ultimate documentation."

March 30-31, 2006: Microsoft appears in closed hearing before European Commission, argues it is meeting the antitrust agency's documentation requirements.

April 24-28, 2006: Court of First Instance holds week-long appeal. Microsoft argues that "companies need to have confidence they won't be forced to hand over their valuable intellectual property to their competitors[and] companies need to have confidence they can develop new products with the features their customers want."

July 3, 2006: EU member states' antitrust regulators vote unanimously to back the 2 million euro ($2.54 million) daily fine.

July 12, 2006: Commission slaps Microsoft with 280.5 million euro ($358 million) fine for non-compliance, and threatens 3 million euro ($3.8 million) per day fine after July 31 if the company continues to thumb its nose at the EU.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll