The Privacy Lawyer: Patriotism, Compliance, And Confidentiality - InformationWeek
09:51 PM

The Privacy Lawyer: Patriotism, Compliance, And Confidentiality

Is it unpatriotic to demand a court order before turning over information under the Patriot Act, Parry Aftab asks?

Thought you understood privacy and data-sharing laws? Think again. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the law known under the acronym Patriot Act) has changed most other privacy laws and what businesses must do when the government comes calling. Some laws were expressly amended and others practically superseded. But it's very confusing either way. And if you make a mistake, the consequences can be serious.

Section 215 of the Patriot Act amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 which authorizes the federal government to request (and obtain) any "tangible things (including books, records, papers, documents, and other items) for an investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities."

As we've learned since Sept. 11, 2001, flight-school rosters, records from educational institutions, vehicle-rental applications, and travel documentation are fertile ground for information about potential terrorists. So, arguably, are search-engine requests, surfing activities, E-mail and instant messaging communications, Web-hosting information, employment records, health-care treatment records, credit-history documentation, library-borrowing records, videotape rentals, telecommunications, and online purchases.

So, how does the Patriot Act affect our privacy and data-management compliance activities? Let me count the ways ...

Significant privacy laws provide for disclosure of personally identifiable information only pursuant to a court order or subpoena. These include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law 104-191 (HIPAA); the Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. 551 (CCPA); the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA); and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. 222.

So what's the problem?
There are a few. While the Patriot Act has made it easier to obtain a court order, federal agents often seek a quick and voluntary disclosure of the information being sought. And, understandably, they often get it. But given the strict limits on what kind of personal information can be shared with law enforcement absent a warrant or court order, can and should a company comply with a voluntary request? As tempting as it may be to voluntarily cooperate, the company may face legal liability if it does.

Secondly, even if the company insists on receiving a court order, warrant, or subpoena before providing the requested information, businesses may face civil liability for violating their own privacy policies. The privacy policies may be posted at their Web sites, included in customer disclosures, or contained in the employee handbooks. They may be mandated by law (in the case of financial institutions under Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.), or voluntarily created. Once in place, however, they become a contract between those relying on the policy and the company. Yet, too often, they are merely copied from another Web site, or from another company's form and rarely, if ever, looked at again. That's when things go seriously wrong.

These privacy policies often omit any explanation of how the company will handle your data if a law-enforcement agency requests it, or shows up with a warrant or court order. Even though the company may have no choice but to comply, absent a policy provision to the contrary, the beneficiary of the privacy policy may be able to sue the company for failing to comply with the policy. This applies to relationships between employer and employee, business and consumer, and business to business.

In addition to violating your privacy policies, compliance with the Patriot Act may also violate your non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements, especially if your non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements require that you notify the other party before turning over information covered by the agreement, since the Patriot Act prohibits notification to the person being investigated.

1 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Digital Transformation Myths & Truths
Transformation is on every IT organization's to-do list, but effectively transforming IT means a major shift in technology as well as business models and culture. In this IT Trend Report, we examine some of the misconceptions of digital transformation and look at steps you can take to succeed technically and culturally.
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll