In court filings last week, Intel said that for three and a half months after AMD filed its suit, a small number of Intel employees whose E-mails were considered potential evidence failed to move all messages to their hard drives, and those messages were automatically purged from Intel's system. Also, a few employees believed erroneously that Intel's IT group was automatically saving their E-mails.
![]() | ![]() |
![]() Judge Joseph Farnan Jr. has rivals working together--sort of | |
![]() |
Farnan gave Intel 30 days to figure out whether any relevant E-mails had been lost and to assess their importance as evidence, says an Intel spokesman. After AMD responds, a court-appointed mediator will report to Farnan, who will make a ruling.
Intel insists that there's no indication that any of the lost E-mails were pertinent to the case or contained damaging evidence. Intel must convince the judge it took proper steps to save evidence or it risks millions of dollars in fines. Or worse--the judge could decide during the trial to instruct jurors that they should assume that the E-mails lost would have been detrimental to Intel's defense. Such a move could give AMD an advantage.