Comments
Cloud Crossroads: Which Way PaaS?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Charlie Babcock
100%
0%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/7/2014 | 3:24:56 PM
Re: How will this PaaS tragedy play out...
Mark Thiele of InterNAP SuperNAP data center builder, (just renamed from Switch), makes an excellent point. There is a bigger issue here. There's no such thing as a cross-cloud PaaS platform, with one or two immature exceptions. Maybe this debate contributes to thinking about one, maybe it doesn't.
Charlie Babcock
0%
100%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/7/2014 | 3:13:18 PM
Does Joshua only pay north of the border?
Brent at ActiveState, not sure why you played the Canadian card. Joshua McKenty is a pretty ranking member here in the Silicon Valley, as well as a Canadian. Do you mean he'll only pays up north of the border? That'll cost him. Isn't the Loonie still worth more than U.S. dollar?
mthiele1001
IW Pick
100%
0%
mthiele1001,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2014 | 2:12:55 PM
How will this "PaaS' tragedy play out is anyone's guess
I really liked Charles' take on the current news relative to Openshift, CloudFoundry and Solum. I'm not sure where I can find fault with any of the arguments he made, but I do think the story and some of the associated comments miss the bigger point about PaaS and it's associated opportunity. Of course if this debate is really just about Solum and Openshift and whether or not they can succeed considering recent industry "re-alignments" that's anyone's guess. Certainly I would have given RedHat's package of offerings more strength if they had maintained a broader and deeper set of contributers. 

The "missed" bigger point in my mind is the gap that many of the current PaaS solutions have relative to being a true "generic" install layer for all applications. There are limitations in all of the current PaaS platforms relative to their ability to absorb any application with any set of tools. The one group that seems to have made the most headway in removing adoption risk (read lock in to specific design architecture for installation of applications) is ActiveState. I'll be the first to admit that I haven't installed and personally tested their solution in an enterprise environment, but if their story is correct, I believe they are taking the right path. 

I strongly believe that we are still all too often considering the adoption of new solutions (I.e., PaaS) as if they are an all or nothing play. We also tend to forget that the dominate adoption opportunities are in several distinct verticals (large SPs/Webscale environments and large enterprise) each of these verticals will have drastically different requirements and adoption models. We may in fact find that complex enterprise environments (shudder to think) might end up with multiple PaaS solutions that are each suited to specific design characteristics in their environment. Of course Bart Copeland might successfully argue/demonstrate that the ActiveState solution can solve the majority of needs. 
brentsmi
50%
50%
brentsmi,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2014 | 12:34:40 PM
Re: To ActiveState Brent: that's not much of an endorsement
I don't think you'd need to declare it here in Canada...
krishsubramanian
100%
0%
krishsubramanian,
User Rank: Strategist
3/7/2014 | 12:19:29 PM
Re: $10 that Joshua McKenty could lose
I am betting $100 that Red Hat *need not* join the CF Foundation. I am not saying this as a Red Hat employee but as an industry observer and as someone who has been advocating PaaS for the past several years (including Cloud Foundry in the past). Most of the pundits are missing the point. The OSS Foundation is about doing open source right. It is especially critical if proprietary vendors are involved in the process. OpenStack is a good example of this and Cloud Foundry is another example. Foundation talks only about the community contribution of source code and the rights and responsibilities associated with it. It has NO IMPACT on the industry adoption of technology. If that is the case, OpenStack and CloudStack should have decimated Amazon, Microsoft, Google and VMware. Conflating the community aspect with industry marketshare is plain marketing by the vendors involved. I am going to do an article talking about this. Expect one by early next week.  
Charlie Babcock
IW Pick
100%
0%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/6/2014 | 8:57:01 PM
IBM SoftLayer CEO Lance Crosby comments
I asked Lance Crosby, CEO of IBM SoftLayer, in an interview the day before this piece appeared why IBM would fund Cloud Foundry over OpenStack Solum/ Red Hat OpenShift. He said: "OpenStack to us is a little below that (PaaS) layer. It's a framework where you bring in the platform that you want, like Cloud Foundry. If it (OpenStack) gets muddy too early, it will be hard for it to be everything to everybody."
Charlie Babcock
100%
0%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/6/2014 | 8:32:48 PM
To ActiveState Brent: that's not much of an endorsement
Ah, gee, Brent Smithurst, that's not much of an endorsement of Red Hat's OpenShift. I guess I'm going to have to accept Joshua's bet myself. Will I have to declare that $10 as income?
brentsmi
50%
50%
brentsmi,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/6/2014 | 6:53:13 PM
Re: $10 that Joshua McKenty could lose
I'll take that bet, Charles. Not that I think OpenShift has a bright future on its own, but because I think it will take them longer than 10 months to figure it out.

By the way, your comment, "There are now powerful vendors who might like to develop Cloud Foundry products that generate revenue, but so far the only one successfully doing so is Pivotal," is incorrect. ActiveState has been selling Stackato (based on Cloud Foundry and Docker) commercially for over two years and we are having great success with it.

Regardless of the above, I enjoyed your article!
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/6/2014 | 12:45:37 PM
$10 that Joshua McKenty could lose
Piston's Joshua McKenty wants to bet $10 Red Hat will join the Cloud Foundry project by the end of 2014. Anyone want to take that bet? I think it's $10 that he could lose.
<<   <   Page 2 / 2


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest September 18, 2014
Enterprise social network success starts and ends with integration. Here's how to finally make collaboration click.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.