IoT
Infrastructure // PC & Servers
Commentary
3/12/2009
07:01 PM
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
RELATED EVENTS
Risk Data as a Strategy
Apr 06, 2016
There is a renewed focus on risk data aggregation and reporting (RDAR) solutions, as financial ins ...Read More>>

The Bill To Blur Google Earth

The satellite imagery in Google Earth and Google Maps is the equivalent of yelling fire in a crowded movie theater, which is to say that it's not protected by the First Amendment right to free speech.

The satellite imagery in Google Earth and Google Maps is the equivalent of yelling fire in a crowded movie theater, which is to say that it's not protected by the First Amendment right to free speech.That loopy bit of pseudo-logic comes from California Assemblyman Joel Anderson who is backing a bill to limit the detail of online maps and to fine violators up to $250,000 per day.

The bill is designated AB-255.

Anderson made the movie theater analogy in an interview with CNET's Charles Cooper. It seems he's keen to provide the United States with the level of censorship demanded by China, India, and Egypt, none of which like the idea of detailed, accurate maps.

Anderson's argument is that satellite imagery is too detailed. He thinks the being able to see too much represents a threat.

"I'm not against the technology; it's fantastic," he told Cooper. "But we're in an evolving world and we have to change our course as it changes. I'm all for online mapping, but knowing where the air ducts are in an air shaft is not necessary for me to navigate in the city. Who wants to know that level of detail? Bad people do."

Anderson says he's not against technology, but it's clear he's against common sense.

The features photographed on satellite imagery are, more or less, visible from the ground. There were terrorist attacks before Google Earth was available and there will continue to be terrorist attacks, whether or not Google Earth's images are blurred.

Anderson insists there are no legitimate uses for detailed satellite images. By that logic, there are no legitimate uses for detailed photographic images taken from the ground, from high buildings, or aircraft. (Indeed, the bill also would limit aerial photography.)

Given that there have been plenty of absurd incidents where still and video cameras have been seized in the name of national security, let's continue the stupidity and insist that lenses be limited to focusing on objects within 50 feet -- a more panoramic expanse could be used by terrorists. And while we're at it, why not mandate the application of Vaseline to every lens to limit dangerous clarity?

Sure, terrorists might use guns to kill people, but that's technology we can't touch, due to the 2nd Amendment. So let's blur maps!

Or not.

If the Constitution ever gets a 28th Amendment, pray that it bans knee-jerk fear-mongering and vapid legislation.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Server Market Splitsville
Server Market Splitsville
Just because the server market's in the doldrums doesn't mean innovation has ceased. Far from it -- server technology is enjoying the biggest renaissance since the dawn of x86 systems. But the primary driver is now service providers, not enterprises.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2016 InformationWeek Elite 100
Our 28th annual ranking of the leading US users of business technology.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of April 24, 2016. We'll be talking with the InformationWeek.com editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week!
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.