Commentary

Alice LaPlante
 

Can't We Just All Get Along?

Apparently not. And some wouldn't have it any other way. Anyone who has ever posted anything on a site with respectable traffic has been on the receiving end of what is, at best, mean-spiritedness, and at worst -- well, much worse.

Apparently not. And some wouldn't have it any other way.

Anyone who has ever posted anything on a site with respectable traffic has been on the receiving end of what is, at best, mean-spiritedness, and at worst -- well, much worse.Most of this sort of thing comes over the transom anonymously, and one's first taste of the more vitriolic aspects of the otherwise exciting give-and-take that characterizes the Web can be a shock to the system. Of course (as has been discussed ad infinitum) the medium itself removes all social barriers to this kind of behavior. As one colleague of mine once memorably observed, it's like handing out free ski masks and machine guns to the general population. Someone's bound to get hurt. How bad the injury--and therefore how seriously we should take cyberbullying--continues to be the subject of intense debate.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Which is why Tim O'Reilly's call last week for a blogger's Code of Conduct raised, as could be expected, a firestorm of commentary, ranging from the (predictably) abusive, to respectful disagreement, to the enthusiastically supportive. O'Reilly has since drafted such a code. Here are the high points:

1. We take responsibility for our own words and for the comments we allow on our blog. 2. We won't say anything online that we wouldn't say in person. 3. We connect privately before we respond publicly. 4. When we believe someone is unfairly attacking another, we take action. 5. We do not allow anonymous comments. 6. We ignore the trolls.

There's an informative, constructive -- and, I'll point out, decidedly civil -- discussion going on at Blogging Wikia in which the consensus seems to be that the no-anonymous comments will be the deal breaker. Among other reasons, many people quite reasonably point out that people from countries with restrictions on Internet freedom or other human rights issues would be effectively barred from online dialogues. Others simply passionately subscribe to anything that smacks of censorship, and warn against the proverbial slippery slope. I happen to agree with that -- even as I delete any e-mails with overtly abusive subject lines from my inbox without reading their contents.

What do you think? Have you been the subject of cyberbullying -- and if so, how have you handled it? Should there be a Code of Conduct? Is it at all realistic to think that such a thing would be adopted by a critical mass of Websites? Let us know by responding below.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links