Commentary

Stephen Wellman
 

Google Almost Gets What It Wants From The FCC

The FCC set the ground rules today for the upcoming 700-MHz auction. While Google didn't get everything it asked for -- the FCC made progress toward opening up spectrum but stopped short of real open network access -- it came pretty close.

The FCC set the ground rules today for the upcoming 700-MHz auction. While Google didn't get everything it asked for -- the FCC made progress toward opening up spectrum but stopped short of real open network access -- it came pretty close.Last week Google hinted that it would only participate in the 700-MHz auction if the FCC supported full open access. But now, according to FierceWireless, Google might still buy spectrum even after today's announcement:


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Following today's FCC meeting, Google's senior counsel Richard Witt made it clear Google has not decided to sit this auction out. Witt notes that the company never said it would not bid if its four openness rules were not adopted for the C Block of the spectrum auction. Google just said that it would bid if they were! Witt, however, cautioned that the company needs to review the details of the FCC's plan once they come out in full during the course of the next few weeks before the company can make any definitive decisions.

Witt also reminded everyone that the FCC only met two of its conditions:

Richard Whitt, Google's Washington telecom and media counsel, said in a news conference immediately following the FCC meeting that there were some "real benefits" in the new rules, but he noted that only two its conditions were met by the FCC. He said the search engine firm needs "time to study" the rules when they are published before it will make a decision on whether it will bid $4.6 billion in the auction.

So will Google buy some spectrum or not?

Personally, I think this is a sign that Google will participate in the auction. Google wants more than just open access for this band of spectrum, though. Google wants to reshape the mobile Web.

Now, I don't think Google wants to be a carrier. But I do think Google wants carriers to change the way they offer mobile Internet access. Google wants open access on as many devices as possible. And if the company has to spend tons of money on spectrum to make the mobile Web more open, then so be it. If anyone has the cash to do this, it's Google.

I also think Google may try to use any spectrum it acquires as a leverage point with carriers. Google could conceivably buy spectrum and then lease it other carriers, but only on Google's terms. If the established carriers refuse, Google could lease the spectrum to upstart carriers, and use the new carriers to force the established companies to open up the mobile Web.

What do you think? Will Google use the FCC's ruling as a way to buy control of the U.S. mobile market? And if Google buys spectrum, will it really change the U.S. market?


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links