Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

Could Linux Help Bring Both Koreas Together?

People in South Korea speak of folks in North Korea more as lost brothers than bitter enemies. Over the years the two have made various rapprochements, but now it looks like North and South are teaming up on a whole new kind of joint project: a Korean-language Linux distribution.

People in South Korea speak of folks in North Korea more as lost brothers than bitter enemies. Over the years the two have made various rapprochements, but now it looks like North and South are teaming up on a whole new kind of joint project: a Korean-language Linux distribution.


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

According to an article in the English-language Korean publication ETNews:

South and North Korea team up to develop a version of 'Hana Linux (tentatively named)' and set standards. [...]

At the conference, IT experts from two Koreas agreed on the need for cooperation in the Linux sector and developing 'Hana Linux.' Besides, the two parties will pursue other projects such as Open Office, an internationally certified (CC) office suite, and developing Korean language [support] for excellent open software.

China has its own state-sponsored Linux distribution, Red Flag, but Hana looks like it's going to be a co-production between both Koreas.

I'm fascinated with the Far East in general -- something which started with curiosity about Japan and China, but over time Korea has come to engage a good deal of my attention, too. The possible reunification of the two countries has long been in the air, but it's always been a question of on whose terms and in what form, and an endless subject for the popular culture of both countries.

Maybe there will be no revolutionary disruption of things, but a gradual melting of the border, so to speak, with the North becoming a more open state over the course of a generation or so. And Linux/FOSS, with its propensity for crossing borders of all kinds, sounds like a great way to help make that happen.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links