The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Over The Air

Topics:   Mobile

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Analyst: Google Not Serious About Spectrum Auction


Posted by Eric Zeman, Jan 18, 2008 04:03 PM

An analyst over at Sanford Bernstein says Google will bid in next week's FCC 700 MHz spectrum auction, but doesn't intend to actually win any spectrum. Why? It already got what it wanted.

MocoNews.net is reporting that Sanford Bernstein analyst Jeff Lindsay thinks Google could bid to win in the spectrum auction, but will much more likely bid to lose. The biggest reasons are that it already influenced the market into adopting more open policies, and something else about a $35 billion commitment.

In order to win any spectrum, Google will have to bid a minimum of $4.6 billion, and possibly up to $10 billion, as Lindsay surmises. Then, Google would have to shell out upwards of $5 billion per year for five years to build and maintain any sort of wireless network. But this is just the tip of the iceberg.

-- Ultimately, Lindsay's view is that Google is still probably bidding to lose. The company obviously wouldn't have such a robust role in the wireless market, but considering its other efforts to push the industry, it's still going to be playing in some way. And this option is far less risky, both from a strategic and financial question.

-- And these risks are pretty significant. The market's view of the company would probably change considerably if management had to start addressing the issues that wireless and cable operators have to deal with or if the company's earnings weren't discussed as cash earnings, but in terms of OCF or EBITDA. And although the report doesn't really address this, such an initiative would require a lot of demands on management in an area that's not their expertise, potentially distracting them from the core business. Even if you can do the math on a spreadsheet to justify an entry into wireless, actually buying and utilizing spectrum looks dicey.

I find it hard to disagree with Lindsay's assessment. Google would certainly be taking a much bigger step into unknown waters. Its managers would have to take on new roles and it would have to answer to the FCC and other government bodies that it hasn't had to deal with regularly in the past.

As besides, it has already achieved what it set out to do: change the minds of the incumbent wireless players. Verizon Wireless has changed its policies and said that going forward it will allow any device and any application to access its network. AT&T followed up Verizon's announcement quickly by pointing out that its network is already open.

And Google has the Open Handset Alliance and Android to worry about. For Google to tackle the hardware, software, and networking all at once could be more than it can handle.

So what will Google actually do next week? Will it put its money where its mouth has been the past six months and pony up the cash to win and become some sort of network operator? Or will it offer up bids that are sure to lose?

Only time will tell.

« IT's 'Self-Fulfilling Prophecy' | Main | Storage Insulation »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Mobile Video


Sign Up For The Over The Air Newsletter
Every Friday, our experts and analysts explore the business, strategy, and management issues most important to mobile and wireless technology.

Sign up for our free, weekly newsletter today!

Newsletter Archives



  1. Actors, Messages and Low Lock Contention for Java
  2. Of Course The Transformers are Multicore with SMT technology
  3. Find John Fast!!


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Why I'm Dropping Bing For Google
  2. Nokia's N97 Gets Massive Firmware Update Promising Bug Fixes
  3. Video: Talking About Firefox 3.5, Apple's Snow Leopard, The Return Of Steve Jobs, & More
  4. Bing Is Worth A Fling
  5. So Long, And Thanks, Google Earth, For All The Fish


  1. Review: Apple's Speedy iPhone 3GS
  2. Tech Innovation USA: From Resilient Networks To Self-Scheduling Devices
  3. How Government's Driving Cloud Computing Ahead
  4. Government As Early Adopter
  5. InformationWeek Analytics: Data Loss Prevention
  6. Strategic Security: Web Single Sign-On

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007