Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

Filling In The Gaps With Open Source

I turn to open source software for a lot of things -- not just the fact that it's almost inevitably free for personal or internal business use, but that it's often written by and for people who have very specific problems that need solving. They're little irritations, problems that typically don't get attention from commercial software makers, and which can be recycled into other solutions by dint of being open source. Here's a local example.

I turn to open source software for a lot of things -- not just the fact that it's almost inevitably free for personal or internal business use, but that it's often written by and for people who have very specific problems that need solving. They're little irritations, problems that typically don't get attention from commercial software makers, and which can be recycled into other solutions by dint of being open source. Here's a local example.


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

One of the reasons I haven't been able to use OpenOffice.org as broadly as I'd like is the fact that it doesn't have a native feature I use constantly in Word: user-editable stacked keybindings.  In Word, if I want to type accented characters -- "é", or "ö", or the like -- I can do that by typing a control-character sequence.  For "é", it's Ctrl-', then the letter E.  These keybindings are totally user-configurable and can even be saved on a per-document-template basis.  With OO.o, inserting special characters is a bit of a hassle -- you either have to insert them by hand, create a macro to handle such things, or use an extension to get around this limitation.

After a while, though, I realized the problem wasn't really with OO.o, but Windows as a whole.  There were plenty of other programs I used -- Firefox, Windows Live Writer, Pidgin, etc. -- that I wanted to use stacked keybindings in, and couldn't.  And as much as I like Word, I'm not about to type everything in it.

Enter a little program called AllChars, available in a 4.0 revision for Windows 98 through XP and a 5.0 alpha-test version for Vista (with Unicode support), and an open source / GPL project to boot.  It extends the kind of stacked-keybinding behavior I've described here to the whole of Windows, so I can now type special characters using whatever stacked-key syntax I like.  The key sequences are totally user-configurable and are stored in an XML file; it took only a couple of moments to edit it and add in a few characters I used constantly, like an O with a macron.

In the past I've toyed with some other programs that have done similar things, some open source and some not, but I've settled on this one for now.  The fact that it's open source also means it has that much more of a lease on life than other freeware tools that are not.  I can't count the number of times I've come across a piece of freeware I've picked up, enjoyed, and then had to abandon when its authors vanished (and the code along with them).  The less I have to put up with such frustrations, the better.

[Footnote: I forgot to mention that the *NIX OSes have had compose-character functionality for a while now -- Linux included -- which is a possible reason why it wasn't added in OpenOffice.org.]


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links