Commentary

Fredric Paul
 

Unified Communications Confounds Small Businesses

Vendors love to talk up the benefits of Unified Communications, but an exclusive study of small and midsize companies by bMighty.com suggests that many companies are not yet getting the message.

Vendors love to talk up the benefits of Unified Communications, but an exclusive study of small and midsize companies by bMighty.com suggests that many companies are not yet getting the message.Despite the best efforts of vendors ranging from Cisco to Avaya to Microsoft and more, the bMighty.com research reveals that more than two-thirds of small and midsize companies still draw a blank when confronted with the term "unified communications."

Yet when provided with a definition -- the integration of multiple modes of communications (voice, e-mail, instant messaging, etc.) with business processes -- nearly three-quarters indicate familiarity with the technologies involved.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

But familiarity doesn't necessarily lead to desire. Two-thirds of SMBs say that UC is more expensive than traditional telecom options, while a slight majority say it's too early for smaller companies to implement UC. Concerns about integration and complexity also crop up, along with the difficulty of calculating ROI when any benefits are spread throughout the company.

While UC proponents such as Don Van Doren, principal of Unicomm Consulting, like to pitch UC's ability to save up to $200,000 per user by transforming business processes, eliminating communications bottlenecks, reducing cycle times, eliminating process steps, and lowering staff requirements, smaller companies aren't yet buying in. Only 16% see UC as a way to gain competitive advantage.

Here's what SMBs DO find valuable in UC: most-valuable-uc-features

You can see more charts from the report in this slideshow, or you can download the entire research report (free; registration required).


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links